Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Raj Kumar Vs. State of H.P.

Decided On : Jul-14-2008

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Indian Penal Code, Section 154, the Probation Act, Article 136

NORP: J.1, Smgani, Sessions

ORG: the Himachal Pradesh High Court, Learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, H.P., dismissed.2, the High Court, PW-7, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, HRTC, Shri Mast Ram, Mast Ram, Ext, Police Station, Constable Kishore, Photographs Negatives Exbts, PW Kishore, IPC, Magistrate, The Trial Magistrate, PW7, the Trial Court, the Probation of Offenders Act, The State of Himachal Pradesh, the Trial Court, Trial Magistrate, the High Court, HRTC Bus, The High Court, The High Court, the Trial Court, the First Appellate Court, Learned Counsel, Delhi Administration, the High Court, Magistrate, the High Court, the Supreme Court, State, the High Court, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, State, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the Revisional Court, the High Court

PERSON: Dalhousie, District Chamba, IPC, Chamba, Tunu Hatti, Manoj Kumar, Kumari Rajeswari, Dalhousie, Exbt, Sarwan Singh, Manoj Kumar, Kumari Rajeswari, Sections 279, Orissa, Nakula Sahu, Jathavedan Namboodiri

CARDINAL: 279, 304A, 1,000/-, one, 34, four, 279, 304A, 1975CriLJ1732, 1999CriLJ1443

DATE: 1860, one year, three months, 16.6.1990, 1973, the same day, 1958, about two decades

TIME: around 12.45 p.m.

GPE: P.C., Duli Chand, Kerala

ORDINAL: first, second

WORK_OF_ART: Probation Act'

PRODUCT: 304A

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //