Sulochana Vs. Rajinder Singh

Decided On : May-16-2008

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Chapter IIIA, Section 45 of Act, Section 2(i, Chapter III, Section 11-A of the Act, Chapter III-A of the Act, Section 23-J. Section 12, Section 45 of the Act, Section 13 of the Act, Chapter III-A, Section 23-J of the Act, Section 23-H, Section 45 of the Act, Chapter III, Chapter III-A, Section 23-J of the Act.19, Section 45 of the Act, Section 45, Section 12, Section 23-J of the Act, Section 12(A, Section 23(J, Section 23(J, Section 23-J of the Act.35, Section 2(b, Section 23-J, Chapter III-A of the Act, Section 23-J of the Act, Section 2(b, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 23-J of the Act, Chapter III-A, Section 13A1, Section 13A1, Section 13A1, Section 13A1, Section 13A1, Section 13A1 of the Act, Article 14 of the Constitution for, Section 13A1 of the Act, Section 13A1 of the Act, Section 13A1, Section 13A1, Section 13-A of the Act, Section 2, Section 23-A(b, Chapter III-A., Chapter III-A, Section 12, Section 45 of the Act, Section 23-A., Section 45, Section 23-J, Section 12, Section 12(1)(e, Chapter III-A

ORG: S.B. Sinha, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore, House, Parasi Mohalla, the State of Madhya Pradesh, Smt, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, The High Court, Court, the High Court, Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, Jurisdiction of Civil Courts, Civil Court, the Rent Controlling Authority, the Rent Controlling Authority, Civil Court, Civil Court, Court, Ors, rent & is, M/s. Rathore & Sons, inter alia stating:1, Ors, the Rent Control Authority, House, Parsi Mohalla, the Rent Controller, inter alia, Civil Court, The High Court, Court, Supreme Court, Civil Court's, Hotel, Lodging House Rates Control Act, Court, Court, Act.39, Court, Court, Mrs Winifred Ross v. Mrs Ivy Fonseca, the Rent Controller, service.40, Court, Malhotra, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, the Rent Controlling Authority, the Rent Controlling Authority, the Rent Controlling Authority, the High Court

NORP: J.1, Nandlal, court.30

DATE: 28th September, 2006, 2004, 23rd March, 1996, monthly, 200/- per month, 29th July, 1996, monthly, 2004, 17th February, 1978, 23rd March, 1996, 9th July, 1990, 1961, are:13, 200/- per month, today, as 29th of March, 1996, as 23rd of March, 1996, one (month, 2002, two months of the date, 23rd of March, 1996, 200/- per month, 200/- per month, 12, 23rd March, 1996, 1978, 1947, September 30, 1981, 12

ORDINAL: Second, second, first, first, second

CARDINAL: 260, 370, two, 1A, 2004.8, 1, 231, two, 2002]SUPP1SCR19, 1, 1, 6, 6, one, 21, 10, 370, 370, 370, 2/-, 2/-, 25, 1, 1, 26, 88, 1, 5, 62, One, 162, 25, 370, 12, 1)(f, 23, 23, 1984]1SCR1005, 1988]2SCR833, three, 1990)1SCC324, two, 20, two, two, two, 23, 23, 16, 23, 23, 1

PERSON: Turab Bhai, Kumar Gupta, Sushil Kumar Jain, Pramit Saxena, Sri Ramakrishna Tapovanam, Rajesh Kumar, defendant.d, Antu Jehara, H.M. Fazal Hussain, Antu Jehara, Hiralal, Harisingh, R.C. Tambrakar, Nidhi Lekha, Sushil Srivastava, Nafis Ahamad, Kalyansingh, Ramswarup, Narayan Rao, Counsel, Ashok Kumar Gupta v., Anr, Winfred Ross, D.N. Malhtora, Kartar Singh, Winfred Ross, Bench, Dutt Rishi, Raj Kumar, D.N. Malhotra, Dhannalal, Kumar Gupta

LOC: appellant.5, Single, Single Judge

WORK_OF_ART: Regular Civil Appeal No., Vijay Kumar Agarwal, Vijay Kumar Agarwal

EVENT: Nangibai 2006

GPE: Dhannalal, Kalawatibai, Bombay, Parvatibai, Counsel, Nandlal, Winifred Ross, Bhagwat, Winfred Ross, Winifred Ross, Mitakshara, Dhannalal

QUANTITY: 370-F

PRODUCT: Act.33

FAC: Sections 11, the Bombay Rents

TIME: 45 of the Act