Ambica Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Decided On : May-18-2007

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 35G(1, Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, Section 35G of the Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 35G of the Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 35, Section 35G and Section 35H, Section 35C, The Finance Act, Section 144, Section 35, Section 145, the Finance Act, Section 35H, Section 35H, Section 35C, Income Tax Act, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 35, Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Article 226, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 36B of the Act, Section 64, Section 274(2, Section 66(2).23, Section 66, the Income Tax Act, Section 66(1, Section 66, Section 66(1, Section 33, Section 66(1, Section ' 66, Section 66(1, Section 66(2, Section 64, the Customs Act, the Customs Act, Section 35H, the Income Tax Act, the I.T Act', Section 256, the I.T. Act, Section 10F, the Companies Act, Section 35G., Section 35, Section 35, Article 226, Article 226, Constitution, Article 226, the Customs Act, Section 35G., Section 35, Section 35, Section 10A, Section 10F of Companies Act, Section 2(11, Section 1A thereof.32, the Companies Act, Section 10F, Order 23, Rule 1, Order 23 Rule 1, Order 23 Rule 2, Order 23, Rule 1, Order 2, Rule 2, Order 2, Rule 2, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 2, Rule 2, Order 2, Rule 2, the Code of Civil Procedure.37, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 20(c, the Code of Civil Procedure and Clause, Article 226, Section 20(c, Article 226 of the Constitution of India

ORG: S.B. Sinha, the High Court, the Central Excise Act.3, Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, Tribunal, the State of Uttar Pradesh, National Capital Territory, State, Tribunal, the Delhi High Court, Court, Union of India, the High Court, Parliament, Counsel, the High Court, Solicitor General, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Tribunal alone.7, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the High Courts, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the Tribunal on or before, the High Court, Final Orders, under:35H. Application, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, inter alia, the High Court at Allahabad, Allahabad, the High Court, Oudh, Oudh, Order, Oudh, Allahabad, the High Court, Oudh, Allahabad, Oudh, Oudh, Allahabad, Oudh, the Court at Allahabad, Tribunal, the Assessing Authority, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, High Courts, High Courts or Courts, the High Court, Parliament, Tribunal, Parliament, the High Court, Learned Counsel, the First Appellate Court, High Court, the High Court, the Subordinate Courts, Tribunal, State, the High Court, State, State, the District Court, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Allahabad, Allahabad, Tribunal, Allahabad, Tribunal, Allahabad, Tribunal, Executive, Parliament, the Commissioner of Central Excise, State, the High Court, Income Tax, Tribunal, the High Court, Court, Delhi High Court, Seth Banarsi, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court', Appellate Tribunal, the High Court' Section 66(2, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court', the High Court', the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court', State, the High Court, State, the Union Territory of Delhi, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Madras High Court, Income Tax, a High Court, the Appellate Tribunal under Section 66, Bench, Bench, the High Court, the Standing Orders, Bench, Suraj Woolen Mills, Collector of Customs 2000, ELT 471, Seth Banarsi, another Division Bench, Spg Mills Ltd, ITO, the C at Jaipur, the Tribunal at Delhi, the Central Bench, ITO, Court, Associates, CIT, the Division Bench, the High Court, State, another High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, Delhi High Court, the State of Bombay, Panipat, the High Court, the State of Mahrashtra, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, Arijit Pasayat & D.K. Jain, this High Court, Court, Seth Banarsi, Income Tax (Central, this High Court, State, Associates, Income Tax 71, DLT, the Apex Court, SC, the High Court', the Division Bench, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, Court, Court, Court, Technological Institute of Textile's, the High Court, CESTAT, Page 2522, State, the High Court, Court, Kusum Ingots, Alloys Ltd., Union of India, Court, Clause 2, Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd., the Union of India, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, Court, the Central Government, Clause 2, Bombay Snuff, Karnataka High Court, Customs, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Technological Institute of Textile's, the High Court, CESTAT, State, Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd., the High Court, Tribunal, Court, Stridewell Leathers, Ors, the High Court, the High Court, Company, the High Court', High Court, Company Law Board, Court, M. Ramnarain Pvt. Ltd., State, India Ltd., Court, Vallabhdas, Court, Hon'ble Court, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Associates, CIT 1998, ITR, CCE, Technological Institute of Textile, Court, CPC, Court, Court, the High Court

NORP: J.1, Tribunal.(2, Court.30

GPE: Lucknow, New Delhi, Delhi, Bombay Snuff, India, Nasiruddin, Lucknow, Lucknow, Lucknow, Lucknow, Allahabad, Lucknow, Allahabad, Lucknow, Bombay Snuff, States, States, Bombay, Counsel, Bombay, Delhi, Bombay, Bombay, Delhi, Bombay, Delhi, Delhi, States, Kerala, Delhi, India, Jaipur, Delhi, Jaipur, Bombay, Bombay, the State of, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Delhi, Enkay, Bombay, Bombay Snuff, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Nasiruddin, Bombay, Bombay, Clause, Mussummat

DATE: 1944, the 1st day of July, 2003, 1908, 1999, 1908, 1999, sixty days, the 1st day of July, 1999, a fee of, thirty days, 2003, 2003, 2003, 1.7.2003, the 1st day of July, 2003, a fee of, forty-five days, 1922, 1968, situated.11, 1991, 1961, 1968, 2000, 30-10-2000, 1944, 1956, today, today, 1956, 1977]2SCR250, 1981, 1981, 1981, 1981, 1981

FAC: Bombay Snuff Pvt, Lucknow Bench, Allahabad Bench, the Lucknow Bench, Sections 35

CARDINAL: 2006(194)ELT264(Del, 9, 9, two, two hundred, one hundred and twenty days, 9, one hundred and eighty days, two hundred, 1, 1, 1, one hundred and twenty days, 5, 1976]1SCR505, 14, 14, one, three, three, one, one, 2, more than one, more than one, only one, two, 3, 1968]70ITR860(Mad, 11(1978)DLT14, more than one, 70, 860, 123, 1980]123ITR354(Delhi, 230, 912, one, three, 1978]113ITR817(Delhi, 772, 2, one, one, 1A, 2006(194)ELT264(Del, 6, more than one, 1983]3SCR25, 36, 44, 36, 44, 44, 230, 917, 915, 2, 2

PERSON: C. Hari Shankar, G.E. Vahanvati, under:35G. Statement, Bench, S.T.A. Tribunal, Tribunal.13, C. Hari Shankar, C. Hari Shankar, Madras, S. Sivaramakrishna Iyer, Dass Gupta, S. Sivaramakrishna Iyer, Madras, S. Sivaramakrishna, Lahoti, J., Dass Gupta, Birla Cotton, CIT Rajasthan, Haryana, Counsel, Dass Gupta, Statute, Suresh Desai, Stridewell Leather, Bhankerpur Simbhaoli Beverages, Bhankerpur Simbhaoli Beverages, Munsha Singh, Anr, Trading Corpn, Nariman, Madan Lal, Nariman, Nariman, Nariman, Suresh Desai, arises.40, Kour v. Partap Singh

ORDINAL: First, Second, Third, second, second, Fourth, Fifth, Second, first

TIME: 35H of the Act, 9-11-1998

PRODUCT: Bench, 158, Gurdit Singh