P.T. Munichikkanna Reddy and ors. Vs. Revamma and ors.

Decided On : Apr-24-2007

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Limitation Acts, the Rule of Law, Article 1 of the Protocol, Article 65, Section 22(1, Section 53-A, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Article 65, Article 144 of the Limitation Act, Article 144 of the Limitation Act, Article 65 of the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Article 17, Section 17(i, the Limitation Act 1980, the Land Registration Act, the Land Registration Act 2002, Article 1 of Protocol No, Article 1 of Protocol No, Article 1 of Protocol No, Article 41

ORG: S.B. Sinha, J.BACKGROUND FACTS1, Additional City Civil Judge, Defendants - Respondents, the High Court, the Trial Court, Court, Reliance, State, State, The Dalhousie Institute Society AIR 1970, Arkansas Commemorative Commission, City of Little Rock 227, Adverse Possession, House of Lords, the Divisional Count, Privy Council's, Lam Island Development Company Limited, Right to Property, Property Rights Regime, the Strasbourg Court, ECHR 921, the European Court of Human Rights, the Court of Appeal, the Convention (Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the High Court, The High Court, Thakur, the Appellate Court, Clarke LJ, Lambeth London Borough Council, P & CR 494, P & CR Planning & Compensation Reports, Saroop, nec, nec precario, Court, Karnataka Board, Wakf v. Government of India and Ors, Oxfordshire County Council and Ors, Ex Parte Sunningwell, the Commons Registration Act, House, nec, nec precario', nec, nec, Karnataka Wakf Board, nec, nec precario', Karnataka Wakf Board, Court, Court, nec, nec, New Paradigm, Court, Ors, Court, Ors, Mahomedally Tyebally v. Safiabai, T. Anjanappa, The High Court, the High Court's, the Judicial Committee, Crown, Crown, The Dalhousie Institute Society, Court, the English Courts, Beaulane Properties Ltd., ECHR 921, the European Court of Human Rights, Court, J.A. Pye, ECHR 921, the Local Land Registry, the Court of Appeal, High Court, the House of Lords, the High Court, Pye, the European Commission of Human Rights, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and, State, The European Council of Human Rights, Beyeler v. Italy, Court, ECHR, Guntas, Guntas

CARDINAL: One, 23, 153/1, 1, 21, 11.09.1933, two, 11.04.1934, 15, 23, 287, 2, 21, two, One, two, 5.7.1936, 4, one, 2d 57, 303, 569, 207, 39, 3, 81, 2, 2, 2, 23, only one, 315, transferee, 38, 7., two, 1, 2, 8., 49, 90, 117, 1, 10, 11.04.1934, more than one, 11, 12, 13, 14, one, 82, two, 38, 452, more than one, 16, 29, 30, 2004)10SCC779, one, 6, 3, 385, 3, 160, 1, 740, three, 3, 160, 1964]6SCR780, 1993)4SCC375, one, 2. Inquiry, 1964]6SCR780, 1995)6SCC523, 144, 65, 1964]6SCR780, 29, 30, 13, 385, 2006(8)SCALE624, 2007)9SCC641, 21, one, 22, 23, 17(ii, 17, 24, 3, 921, 49, 90, 25, 26, 23, 2000, 25, 1, 32, 1, 33, three, 33202/96, 108, 1, 35., 21, 1.9.1933, 23, 11.04.1934, 21, 23, 38, 39, 25,000/-

PERSON: Thippaiah, Nanjapa, Bangalore, P. Krishnamoorthy, Debendra Lal Khan, Monnot v. Murphy, Vol, Limitation Statutes, Fairweather v. St Marylebone Property Co, Taylor, Taylor, Chung Ping Kwan, JA Pye, Keene, Kishan Singh, Arvind Kumar, Blackburn, Powell, Macfarlane, Banto, Vasantiben Prahladji Nayak, Somnath Muljibhai Nayak, Mohd, Mohd, Ali, Jagadish Kalita, nec clam, possession18, Murthy v. Ravula Somasundaram, Fry J., nec clam, nec clam, nec clam, S.M. Karim, Bibi Sakina, Parsinni, D.N. Venkatarayappa v. State, Bibi Sakina, Periasami v. P. Periathambi, Mohan Lal v. Mirza Abdul Gaffar, nec clam, Bibi Sakina, M. Durai, Banto, Vasantiben Prahladji Nayak, Somnath Muljibhai Nayak, Mohd, Mohd, Ali, Kasambhai Sheikh, Kasambhai Sheikh, Somalingappa, Anr, Bhagat Ram, Govindammal, Debendra Lal Khan, Krishnamoorthy, Cossye, JA Pye, Graham, Grahams, Grahams, Grahams, Graham, Grahams, Grahams, Grahams, Graham Anr, Grahams, Bingham, Browne-Wilkinson

QUANTITY: 5 acre, 1 acre, 2 acre, 3 acre, 5 acre, 1 acre, 6 App, 1 acre, the 5 acres 25, 5 acres 23, 1 acre, 1 acre, 1 acre

GPE: Chikkabanavara Village, O.S., N.Y., Rock Springs v., Limitation, Scrutton, L.J., Hong Kong, India, United Kingdom, Singh, Narne Rama, Dalton, Beresford, S.M., Limitation, Articles 64, S.M., Madhu, Saroop, Singh, Mohammadbhai, Des Raj, United Kingdom, the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom

DATE: the year 1988, 1989, the past over fifty years, more than 50 years, between 1934-1936, Fla. 1958, Ark. 1085, 1957, 1913, 1929, 97 1 5, 2d, 1962, 1020, 1962, 1930, 1930, 12 years, 1932, 1992, 1997, the 21st Century, 2005, 2005, 2001, 2001, 2001, 12 years, 1977, 2005, 1989, 1999, 1999, 1834, 211'openly, 1881, 1965, less than 20 years, 2003, 1306, 2004, several 12 years' or, 12 years, 1908, 12 years, 1963, 21, 2004, 1908, 1908, 1963, a period of, 12 years, 60 years, 1789, 1948, 2005, 2005, 2005, 2005, 2005, December 1983, September 1984, 1999, 1997, 12 years, 1925, 12-year, 12 years, 12 years, 2002, the summer of 1984, 12 years, the days, 1925, 1980, 34, 36, 1933

NORP: stating:.The, American, R., Articles 142, Mohammedans, R.

PRODUCT: 240 100, N.E. 742, K.B. 16, Appellant, Palmer 2005, Pye

MONEY: 494 273 P. 908 A.L.R.

WORK_OF_ART: 2 All ER 288, 1 All ER, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd and Ors, 3 All ER 865 House of Lords, judgment:[The Grahams

ORDINAL: firstly, first, second, first, second

EVENT: the 1980 Act