Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Chairman and Md V.S.P. and ors. Vs. Goparaju Sri Prabhakara Hari Babu
Decided On : Mar-05-2008
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 58, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 58, the Indian Evidence Act, Respondent 1, Article 226 of the Constitution of India
ORG: S.B. Sinha, the Enquiry Officer, the Certified Standing Order, TPP/107613/95/2255, CW, CW, CE, CE, the Certified Standing Orders of the Company, Company, Demand/No Demand, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, the High Court, the High Court, intra court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, See Maruti Udyod Ltd., State of Bihar and Ors, SBI, State, State of M.P. and Ors, Ors, Union of India and Ors
NORP: J.1, Technician
DATE: 11.10.1989, a period of, 12 months, 11.6.1990 to 27.6.1990, 28.2.1991, 53 days, 28.12.1990 to 28.2.1991, 18.6.1991, 16.4.1992, a period of, 99 days, April 1992 to September 1992, the period of, 20 days, April 1995, 19.6.1995, these many days, thirty days, April 1995, 30 days, June 95 to July 96, 11.3.1997, the years 1990, 1991, 1993, 1995 and, 1996, the last date, the year 1992 till, 1995, 19.6.1995, 2008
CARDINAL: 3., 9.1.1991, 2.7.1991, 11.7.1991, 13.8.1991, 30.8.1991, one, 5., 1.5.1995, 30.5.1995, about 9.6.1995, 6, 5.6.1995, 1.5.1995, 30.5.1995, 19.6.95, 9.7.1996, three, 18.3.91, 22.9.92, 5.6.95, 16, 10.5.1997, 6.8.1997.11, 14, 6475, 2005)ILLJ853SC, 2006(9)SCALE549, 2006(11)SCALE258, 2007)ILLJ996SC, 2008)1SCC456, 576, 22.1.2008.]16
GPE: Mukkillapadu, justified.12, Karnataka v. Ameerbi
PERSON: Nuzivedu Mandalam, Venugopal, Rao, Sangramsinh P. Gaekwad, Shantadevi P. Gaekwad, Ram Lal, Amrendra, Kumar Mishra, Mahatma Mishra, Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran, Surji Devi CA No
LOC: Krishna District, Single Judge