Ajay Goswami Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Dec-12-2006

Court: Supreme Court of India

LAW: Article 19(1)(a, Article 19(1)(a, Article 32 of the Constitution?7, Article 19(1)(a, Article 21, Article 39(f, Constitution, Article 15, Article 24, Article 39, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Article 25, Article 24, Article 45, Article 37, Article 19(1)(a, Article 21, Article 39(f, Constitution, Article 21, Article 32, Article 142, Article 32, Article 142, Article 141, Article 144 of the Constitution, the Cinematograph Act, Section 6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, Section 6, the Indian Penal Code, Article 19(1)(a, the Constitution of India.16, Section 14, Section 14(2)(a, the Indian Penal Code, the Constitution of India, the Indian Constitution, Article 19(1)(a, the Indian Constitution, Section 1(3, the Press Council Act, Section 13, the Indian Penal Code, Article 19(1)(a, Constitution, Article 19(2, Article 19(6, Article 19(1)(a, Section 292 I.P.C.', Section 292 I.P.C., the Federal Constitution's First Amendment, the First Amendment, Constitution, Article 19(2, Section 14, Section 14(1, the Constitution of India, Constitution

PERSON: Lakshmanan, Nos, Ajay Goswami, Harish Chandra, P.H. Parekh, Sanjay Kumar, A.K. Seth, Gopal Jain, Vimal Chandra, S. Dave, Anr, AR, Lakshmanan, Milton, Unnikrishnan, judgments.8, Anr, Mathew, J., M.C. Mehta v. State of, Ajay Goswami, Ajay Goswami, Anr, K.S. Jagnathan, Ajay Goswamy, Harish Chandra, Penalty-, P.H. Parekh, Vishaka, Anr, Kalyandas Kakodkar, Anr, Amal Mitra, Anr, Articles, Miller, Alfred E. Butler, Gopal Jain, taste.ii, Hidayatullah, Nos, Nos, Virendra, Anr, Anr, AR, Lakshmanan, Hicklin, Kalyandas Kakodkar, Udeshi, Anr, Amal Mitra, Anr, Articles, Miller, Janet Reno v., D. Udeshi, Lady Chatterley's, Udeshi, S. Ragarajan, P. Jagjivam Ram, Hidayatullah, Abbas, P.H. Parekh, P.H. Parekh, K.Jayachandra Reddy, Nos, Nos

NORP: J.1, English, Unni, Indian, American, English, American

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 5, four, 24, 1.8.2005, 613, one, 1984]2SCR795, 3, 1993]1SCR594, 165, One, 875-76, 1700)The, one, 9, 10, 1997)IILLJ724SC, one, one, three, 12, two, 1986]2SCR17, 1998CriLJ1208, 14, 1, 3 & 4, 24, II, two thousand, one, 292, 293, two thousand, five thousand, 2, 17, 18, 6.1.2002, two, 2, 2002]3SCR696, 3, 3 and 4, 14(1, 14(2, 20, 2, 687, 1986CriLJ24, 50, 22, 23, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 17, three, 5, 6, 3, 11, 360, 1, 2, 1, 2, two, two thousand, five thousand, 4 and 6, 1958]1SCR308, two, 30, 1970CriLJ1273, 50, 22, 23, 146, 1965CriLJ8, 41, 3, 4, 4, 43, 1, One, one, 146, 2d, 3

ORG: Union of India, Court, United Nations Convention, Court, and(b, SMS, MMS, us.5, Court, MMS, Times of India, United Nation Convention, Court, Directorate General of, Anand Patwardhan, C.A. No, this Court:.The Indian Penal Code, Court, Lakshmikant Pandey v. Union of India, the Study Team on Social Welfare, State, Clauses, State, The Government of India, Children, the Government of India, Court, State of, Andhra Pradesh and Ors, Court, Court, Fundamental Rights, Court, Nation, Court, Brown v. Board of Education, US 483, State, T.N., State, State, the UN General Assembly, United Nation Convention, Court, State, The Press Council of India, Court, Council, Court, Court, Court, Comptroller & Auditor General of, Court, Court, U.O.I., Court, Court, Court, Committee, Union of India, the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, the Department of Women & Child Development, Ministry of Human Resources Development, the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition, the Ancient Monument and Archaeological Sites, Sections 3 & 4, Sections 3 & 4, the 'Press', the Press Council, Council, Press Council, Learned Counsel, the Central Government, the Press Council Act, the Directorate of Audio Visual Publicity, the Central Government Advertisement Policy, DAVP, the Press Council of India, Learned Counsel, Court, the Press Council, the Press Council Act, the Press Council Act, Court, Ors, U.O.I., Ors, Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms, Court, Learned Counsel, Times of India, the Indecent Representation of Women Act, Sections 3 and 4 of the Act, the Press Council of India, Press, the Press Council of India Act, the Press Council, the Newspaper, News Agency, the Press Council, Learned Counsel, Newspaper, National and International, Learned Counsel, Court, Doordarshan, Anand Patwardhan (Supra, The State of Maharashtra and Ors, Court, Court, Court, Court, Learned Counsel, the U.S. Supreme Court, the Times of India, Hindustan Times, Guidelines, the 'Norms of Journalistic Conduct', Press, Learned Counsel, Frenchman, Learned Counsel, Hindustan Times, the advertising department, the Press Council, HT Next-, Hindustan Times, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, Court, Court, Parliament, Government, Common Cause v. Union of India and Ors, Government, Parliament, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, Court, Expert Committee, Council, Council, Council, Council, Council, or(d, figure-(i, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites, the Indecent Representation of Women Act, Court, Arts, Court, Directorate General of, Anand Patwardhan, L.S. Panta, The State of Maharashtra and Ors, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, The American Courts, State, U.S. Supreme Court, State, American Civil Liberties Union, The Federal Government's, Government, Congress, Led 2d 865, Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc., State, Court, Contemporary Standards36, the Supreme Court, Lover, the Indian Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Samresh Bose v. Amal Mitra, Court, Court, Frenchman, the Press Council of India, Press Council, Press Council, the Press Council of India, the Press Council, the Press Council Act, Council, the Government de-recognition, The Press Council of India, the Press Council, the Government of India, Council, the Press Council of India, the Press Council Act, the advertising department, the press Council, HT Next School Times', Fraser v. Evans, QB 549.44, The Times of India, Hindustan Times, the American Supreme Court, Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc., State, Times of India, Hindustan Times, the Press Council of India, Section, the Government of India

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Porn In, VI, the Constitution of India

DATE: 1989, the age of fourteen years, 1954, Today, Today, these days, 28th January, 1950, 4th February, 1993, 20th November, 1989, 1986, 1986, 1958, 1952, 37 of 1952, 1986, two years, less than six months, five years, the age of twenty years, seven years, 1978, the year 1999, 1978, 1.6.2006, 1978, 1978, 1998CriLJ1208 3, 1962, '26, 2004, 1978, 1978, two years, five years, 1958, 24 of 1958, 1986, the day, 19(1)(a, 1868 3, a quarter of a century ago, 7.8.2006, 1978, between 1999-2003, 1978, 17.12.2002, 1978, Monday, today, the last few decades, each year, 1969

GPE: India, Gandhari, India, Unnikrishnan, J.P and Ors, IV, Holiness, Kerala, India, it.v, India, France, England, K.A.Abbas, Kailash Chand, India, England, India, United States, India, England, UK, K.A., India, India, Delhi, United States

TIME: morning

PRODUCT: Bench, Child

FAC: Vineet Narain and

ORDINAL: first, second, first, second, first, second, first, first

LANGUAGE: English