Goodricke Group Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Decided On : Mar-08-1995

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

LAW: Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 143(3, Section 251, Section 80HHC, Section 154 dt, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Rule 8(1, Section 80HHC, Constitution, Article 245, Constitution, Article 366(1, Rule 24, Article 245 of the Constitution with entry, Article 366(1, Article, Rule 24, Rule 24, Section 2(1, Section 10(1, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Article 141 of the Constitution, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC

CARDINAL: 1, four, 1, 2, 3, 4., 22, 7, 16,10,84,531Less, 6,41,96,600Add, 57,892, 6,42,54,492 3, 16,04,91,502, 52,20,63,921FOB, 64,08,581*Thus, 64.08.581, 40, 60, 207, 196, 149, 49, II, 82, 1, 48, 1968, 69, 8, 173, 37, 82, 46, 48, 1968, 69, 667, 8, three, 10, two

GPE: India, India, Ld, D.R., India, Kerala, India, India

ORG: the CIT (Appeals, the CIT (Appeals, the I.T. Rules, the Calcutta High Court, CIT, Indian Products Ltd., Reliance, the Supreme Court, CIT, Rayon Silk Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Mcleod Russel, CIT, ITD 396, the State Legislature, the Central Parliament, the Supreme Court, Karimtharuvi Tea Estates Ltd., State, Anglo-American Direct Tea Trading Co. Ltd., CAIT, Tata Tea Limited v. State, SC, the Supreme Court, the State Legislature, Parliament, Karimpharuvi Tea Estates Ltd., ITR, Anglo-American Direct Tea Trading Co. Ltd., Rules 7 &amp, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Mcleod Russel, India) Ltd., the Supreme Court, Tata Tea Limited, the Supreme Court, the Tata Tea Limited's, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court

MONEY: the 40 per cent, 60 per cent, 100 per cent, 40 per cent, 40 per cent, 40 per cent, 60 per cent, 40 per cent, 40 per cent, 60 per cent

DATE: 1994, 1992, 1994, 46, 1963, 1922, 1961, 1962, 1988, 18, 36, 1963, 1922, 1961, 1922, 1922, 1962, 1961, 1922, 1962, 1922, 1961

PRODUCT: the Calcutta Bench

ORDINAL: 7th, Seventh, first, first

NORP: Indian, Indian

PERCENT: 60%

EVENT: the I.T. Rules

PERSON: Mcleod Russel