Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Paresh P. Rajda Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Decided On : May-16-2008

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 395, Section 395, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141, the Companies Act, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act

PERSON: Singh Bedi, Neeta Bhalla, Anr, Shekhar Singh, Neeta Bhalla, Anr, Bench, Bench, Directors, Paragraphs 2, Paresh Rajda

NORP: J.1, N. Rangachari, N. Rangachari, Hon'ble

ORG: Criminal Appeals, SLP, SLP, Tata Finance Limited, Rupees One Lakh, Notice, Company, Company, The High Court, the Metropolitan Magistrate, Magistrate, the High Court, The High Court, Company, us.4, S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd., the High Court, Counsel, Company, Counsel, S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd., State, Sanchar Nigam Ltd., S.M.S Pharmaceuticals, Court, Directors, Question (C, Section 141.6, Bench, Bench, Bench, S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Board of Directors, S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals, Joint, Company, the High Court, Company, Court

DATE: 3074, 3075 of 2006, 2006, 1881, November 2001, 18th December 2001, 20th December 2001, June 2004, 1974, 18th October 2004, 20th December 2005, 1881, daily, 1956, 5, the day to day, 15 days, 1881

PRODUCT: the 'Act', Joint

CARDINAL: two, 1 i.e., 2005CriLJ4140, 2, 8, 2007)4SCC70, 2007CriLJ2442, 2007CriLJ2448, 2005CriLJ4140, three, Three, 2, three, two, 2007)4SCC70, 21, trial.8, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, 6, 1, 8), 2, 1, 1, 3, 4,5, 6, 1, 1, 141, 2

ORDINAL: 25th, 9th, first

GPE: Delhi, Counsel, Rangachari

FAC: N.K. Wahi

WORK_OF_ART: The accused No

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //