Rattanlal Dangi Vs. Income-tax Officer

Decided On : Jan-17-1995

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

LAW: Section 139(2, Section 142(1, Section 144, Section 271(1)(a, Section 271(1)(a, Section 144, Section 139, Section 139 or Section 148, Section 139, Section 139(2, Section 271, Section 144, Section 144, Section 144, Section 144.16

CARDINAL: 1, 8, 1, 8,75,516, 2,41,390, 5,000, 5, 25-3-1988, 25-3-1988, 25, three, 5,000, 31, up to, 25, 5, 25, three, 1, 2, 1, 10, 31, 1-8-1982, 25-3-1988, 25, one, one

PERSON: Moti Magri Scheme, Udaipur, Dangi Rs, 2,14,430 Rs, Dangi Rs, 2,14,930 Rs, Dangi Rs

ORG: Hindustan Zinc Ltd., AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, the Commissioner (Appeals, AO, AO, Departmental Representative, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Apex Court

DATE: the year, 67 months, 1985, thirty months, 67 months to 30 months, 1982, every month, that year, the day, that particular year.15

GPE: A.O.

PERCENT: 2%

ORDINAL: first, first