Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Municipal Council, Sujanpur Vs. Surinder Kumar
Decided On : May-05-2006
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: a Division Bench, the Punjab Municipal Act, Industrial Disputes Act, Section 10(1)(c, Section 2(S, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 106 of the Evidence Act, Section 11A, Article 12 of the Constitution of India, Article 12 of the Constitution, Section 41]In, the Industrial Disputes Act
ORG: S.B. Sinha, Haryana High Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, Shri R.S. Puri, the Government of Punjab, The Labour Court, the Labour Court, The Labour Court, The Labour Court, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court's, The High Court, the Labour Court, The High Court's, the Judicial Review of Administrative Action, Karnataka and Ors, Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd., Bombay Environmental Action Group, The Labour Court, the High Court, U.P. State Brassware Corporation and Ors, State, Reserve Bank of India, the Labour Court, the High Court, Labour Court, State, M.P. Housing Board, Court, words:-A, The Labour Court, Clause 2(vi, the Standard Standing Orders, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, State, Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board, Advanced Law Lexicon, 3rd Edn, under:'Status, Salmond, Parliament, the Fifth Schedule, BHEL, the Legislative Assembly, the Labour Court, Appellant
NORP: J.1, Punjab, Supervisory, Punjab
DATE: 4988, 2002, 1.4.1994, 16.7.1997, daily, 240 days, twelve months, 240 days, a calendar year, March 1994, April 1994 to February 1996, March 1996, July 1997, 240 days, twelve months, 2006, 1966)ILLJ749SC, more than six months, daily, 1972, 4470, 3733, years, 356 days, 208 days, 1947
CARDINAL: 22.11.2001, 3., one, 8., AIR2006SC1204, 9, 2006)ILLJ496SC, 2, 610, 2005)IILLJ258SC, 10, 11, 16, 2006)IILLJ800SC, 12, one, 2006)IILLJ241SC, 4, 253, 257, 88)The, 1, 2006)ILLJ1102SC
GPE: Gurdaspur, Gurdaspur, Supervisor, Sujanpur, Supervisor, India, Karnataka, Subhash Chand, Holland
LOC: the Appellant herein
PRODUCT: Shri Surinder, Appellant, Appellant, Articles 14
ORDINAL: second
WORK_OF_ART: Appellant
PERSON: S.A De Smith, S.N. Chandrashekar, Anr, Udit Narain, Arjan Lal Rajak, Bangalore, S. Mani, S. Mani, M.V. Bijlani v. Union, Jagdip Singh, Uma Devi, Anr, Manoj Shrivastava, Anr, Vol, Duggamma v. Ganeshayya, Roshan Lal Tandon v. Union, B.K. Vijay