Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

State of Kerala Vs. B. Renjith Kumar and ors.

Decided On : Jun-05-2008

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Presiding Officers (, Article 234 of the Constitution of India, Article 234 of the Constitution of India, the Presiding Officers of, Article 233 of the Constitution of India, Article 136 of the Constitution of India.7, the Industrial Disputes Act, the ID Act, Section 7A of the ID Act, Section 7A, Section 7A, the ID Act, Constitution, Constitution, Article 309, Article 311, the Presiding Officers of, Article 233 of the Constitution of India, Article 234 of the Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 233 of the Constitution, Article 236(2, the ID Act, the ID Act, Section 7 of the ID Act, Article 234 of the Constitution, Article 234 of the Constitution, Article 234 of the Constitution, Para 5 SCC, the Industrial Disputes Act, Article 236 of the Constitution, Article 236, Article 236(b, Article 233 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 233, Article 236, Constitutional, Constitution, Constitution, Article 39(d, Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution.14

ORG: Lokeshwar Singh Panta, the High Court, the State Government, the State Government, G.O., the Subordinate Judiciary, State, O.P. No. 20490 of, the State Government, the State Government, the High Court, the State Government, the High Court, Government of Kerala, Subordinate Judiciary, the National Judicial Commission, Labour and Rehabilitation Department, State, the High Court, the High Court, the State Government, State, Department of Finance, the Labour Court, Industrial Tribunals, the National Judicial Pay Commission, the Higher Judiciary, the State Government, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the National Judicial Commission, the Higher Judicial Services, I.A. No, the High Court, the High Court, the Industrial Tribunals, the Judicial Officers, the Industrial Tribunal, the High Court, Court, Court, The Labour Courts, the Industrial Tribunals, Industrial Tribunals, Tribunal, Tribunal, a High Court, a Labour Court, the State Government, Tribunal, the Industrial Disputes (Kerala Amendment) Act, Judicial, a High Court, the Industrial Tribunal, Industrial Tribunals Services, Pay Commission, Justice, Commission, the Industrial Tribunals (Entry Cadre, Commission, The Government of Kerala, Industrial Tribunals, the Pay Commission, State Government, Industrial Tribunals, Subordinate Judiciary, the State Government, the Industrial Tribunals, the Government of India, Court, 21.3.1994, the First National Judicial Pay Commission, the Subordinate Judiciary, National Judicial Pay Commission, the Subordinate Judiciary, the Labour Courts, the State Government, the High Court, the Industrial Tribunal, The High Court, The State Government, the Shetty Commission, the Industrial Tribunal, the Judicial Services, State, the State Government, the Industrial Tribunal, The High Court, the State Government, the Pay Revision Committee, the Pay Revision Committee, the High Court, the Industrial Tribunals, Petitioners, Government, the First National Judicial Pay Commission, the First National Judicial Pay Commission, U.P., Court, the High Court, the Judicial Officers, The Industrial Tribunals, the High Courts, the High Court, Tribunal, State, Maharashtra, the High Court, the State of Maharashtra, the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, the Labour Court, the State of Maharashtra, the Labour Court, the High Court, the State of Maharashtra, the Labour Court, Maharashtra, Division Bench, the High Court, the State of Maharashtra, Court, Court, Bombay Industrial Relations Act, Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, the Labour Court, Court, Labour Court, the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, The Labour Courts, Bharat Bank Ltd., SC 459, Court, Industrial Tribunal, Tribunal, Industrial Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Court, Civil Procedure, Cooper v. Wilson, Court, Labour Court, State, Principal Civil Court of Original Jurisdiction, Labour, Labour, Industrial Courts, the Principal Civil Court, Judges of, Industrial Court, the Principal Civil Court, Labour Courts, Industrial Courts, Judicial, Uttar Pradesh and Ors, Court, the U.P. Higher Judicial Service Rules ', Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the Directive Principles of State Policy, D.S. Nakara v. Union of India, Court, Union of India, the Central Government, Radio Mechanic in Assam Rifle, Central Paramilitary Forces

NORP: J.1, Rules

GPE: the State of Kerala, Kerala, Ernakulam, O.P., the District Judges, the State of Kerala, the District Judges, the District Judges, the District Judges, the District Judges, the District Judges, District Judges, the State of Kerala, Kerala, the District Judges, District Judges, District Judges, Counsel, District Judges, the State of Kerala under, India, the State of Kerala, the State of Kerala, District Judges, District Judges, the District Judges, District Judges, District Judges, District Judges, the District Judges, District Judges, the District Judges, the District Judges, District Judges, the District Judges, O.P., District Judges, Clause, District Judges, District Judges, District Judges, IA, functions.12, District Judges, District Judges, District Judges

DATE: 5th December, 2003, three months, the year 1993, the year 1996, the year 1998, December, 2001, March, 1996, 25.11.1999, 1999, 12.1.2001, 12.12.2001, 7.1.2002, March 1, 1997, 30 years, the year 1998, the year 1998, 1947, 1947, 1947, less than five years, ten years, 1961, 1947, 1947, Rs.2600-3800/-, 3700-4200/-, 3700-4200/-, 3175 - 4605/-, 4435-5285/-, 1.7.1988, the year, 1993, the year 1998, 1947, more than 30 years, 20490/1999, the year 1998, 1947, more than three decades, 1947, 1947, 8.3.1997, 1946, 1971, 1950, 1937, 11, 12, pre-independence days, '13, Articles 14, 16

CARDINAL: 8947/03(M, 1, 2, 3, 1.7.1996, 15.5.1999, 1.1.1996, 18.4.2000, 231/2001, 4.2.2003, 16,300, 16,750-400, 18,750-400, 234, 1 to 3, 2, 7A, 1, one, 2, one, 3, less than three, 4, two, 8., 28, 3, 3, 3, 1.7.1988, three, three, 5100-5700/-, 5100-5700/-, 25.11.1999, two, 6, 10, 2, 2/2004.12, 1998)ILLJ868SC, 8.3.1979, 1, 234, 235, 692, 5, 6, 692, 2, 340, two, four, 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 236, 1982)ILLJ344SC, 1983)ILLJ104SC, two

PERSON: Nos, Judicial Officers, Exhibit P8, G. Prakash, Articles 233, Malini Poduval, Nos, C.N. Sreekumar, C.N. Sasidharan, Gazette, T.Chandrashekhara Menon, Sessions Judges, Chandra Mohan v. State, Labour Law Practitioners' Association, Articles 233, pp 694-695:10, Chandra Mohan v. State, Articles 233, Randhir Singh v. Union, Bench this, Dineshan K.K. : AIR2008SC1026

PERCENT: 35%, 35%, 35%, 35%, 15%, 35%

WORK_OF_ART: Presiding Officers of, Presiding Officers of

LOC: the District Judges, the District Judges, the District Judges, The District Judge

EVENT: General Clauses Act

PRODUCT: Rules

FAC: Constitutional

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //