Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Punjab Aromatics Vs. State of Kerala

Decided On : Apr-30-2008

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 5A, Section 5A, Section 5A, Section 5, Section 5A, Section 5A, the Amending Act 3 of 1990, Section 5A(1)(a, Section 5A(1)(a, Section 5A(1)(a, Section 7A(1)(a, Section 5A(1)(a, Section 5A(1)(b, Section 5A, Section 5A, Article 226 of the Constitution, Constitution, The Boroughs Act, the Municipal Act, Constitution, Article 286 of the Constitution, the Boroughs Act, Article 286(1, Article 286 of the Constitution, Article 286 of the Constitution, Article 286(1)(a, Constitution, the Constitution (Sixth Amendment) Act, Article, Article 286(1)(a, Constitution

PERSON: S.H. Kapadia, Levy, Shri Soli J. Sorabjee, Iyer, Jaipur, Iyer, Iyer, Paul A. Samuelson, B. Raghurama Shetty

NORP: J.1, Western

DATE: 1963, '1963 Act', 1963, 1963, 1963, 1963, 1963, 1963, 1959, 1959, 1963, 1935, 20, 1925, 1954, 1953, 1069, 1084, 1956, 1976, 1956, 1956

ORG: Department, i.e. red oil, Department, State, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, Department, Court, Department, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, Legislature, Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, State, Tungabhadra Industries Ltd., Court, Tungabhadra industries Ltd., Court, Shyam Oil Cake Ltd., Shyam Oil Cake Ltd., Court, Court, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, The State of Tamil Nadu v. Subbaraj and Co., Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, State, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tax Revision, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Court, Burmah-Shell Oil Storage, Distributing Co., India Ltd., Beglaum, Burmah-Shell, the State List, Court, the Government of India Act, Scheduled Tax Rules, Legislature, Court, The State of, The United Motors, State, State, Anwarkhan Mahboob Co., The State of Bombay, Court, Court, Burmah-Shell, Court, Entries, the Legislative Lists, Entries, the Legislative Lists, Entries, Legislative Lists, Legislature, Entries, the Legislative Lists, Court, Court, Burmah-Shell, Counsel, Court, State, miller, VAT, VAT, miller, miller, VAT, Court, Court, Explanation, Court, the High Court

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, two, two, 1961]2SCR14, 18(2, 18, two, One, 66, 16, two, 18, 49, 52, 19, two, 20, two, 1961]1SCR709, more than one, one, transferee, 19, 20, 20, 1981]3SCR280, 8, 9, 168, 9, two, two, 11.9.1956, 21.12.06

GPE: Counsel, Counsel, Bombay, Karnataka v. B. Raghurama Shetty

EVENT: the 1963 Act, the 1963 Act

MONEY: 100 per cent

WORK_OF_ART: Collector of Central Excise, Tenth Edition

LOC: years.17, Municipality

FAC: Belgaum Borough Municipality

ORDINAL: Firstly, Secondly, first, second, third

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //