Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Millenium Mumbai Broadcast Pvt. Ltd.

Decided On : Apr-28-2006

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Licence Agreement, Article 7.1(i, this Licence Agreement, Section 14(1)(c, Section 14

ORG: S.B. Sinha, Union of India, the Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal, Notice, the Government of India, Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, Licence Agreement, Bank Guarantee, this Ministry of the, the Bank Guarantee, Union of India, FM Broadcasting, Appellant, the Bank Guarantee, the Delhi High Court, the Delhi High Court, the Bank Guarantee, Appellant, The High Court, Bank Guarantee, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Union of India, Tribunal, inter alia, Tribunal, the Respondent/Government, Licensees, Letter of Intent, the Wireless Planning & Coordination Wing, the Ministry of Communications, Government of India, Schedule-C, Bank Guarantee, Licence, the Licence of the Licensee, Licence, Bank Guarantee, Scheduled Bank, Additional Solicitor General, Appellant, Clause 1.2 and Clause 12.1, Schedule-C, Additional Solicitor General, Tribunal, Clauses 14, Calcutta/Chennai/Delhi/Mumbai, the Licence of the Licensee, Clause 1.2, Additional Solicitor General, Clause 12.1, Clause 12.1, the Specified Undertaking, the Unit Trust of India, Garware Polyester Ltd., Tribunal, Additional Solicitor General, Tribunal, the Union of India, The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Appellant, the Union of India, Migrate, Phase 2 Policy Regime, Phase 2 Policy, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, inter alia, Cabinet, the High Court, Learned Counsel, Shri L.P. Singh, Corrigendum, the High Court, the High Court, the FM Broadcast, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal

NORP: J.1

GPE: New Delhi, India, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Licence, India, Licensor, Mumbai

DATE: 3rd October, 2005, 2005, the month of October, 1999, 24 months, two years, four months, one year, 29th December, 2003, the second year, 29th April, a period of, seven days, the beginning of each year, the second year, the second year, May 16, 2003, 9 days, May 17, 2003.However, 16.5.2003, 2.5.2003, the 2nd year's, 2003, 2.7.2003, 3.9.2003, 15.3.2004, the second year's, the second year, 29.4.2004, the third year, 20.4.2004, 29th April, 2004, 29th April, 2004, the second year, 30 days, seven days, the beginning of the year, Licensor, Licensor, 30 days, the first year, 10 years, 7 days, one year's, 30 days', 30 days', ten years, Licensor, 30 days', 30 days', 30 days', 30 days', 06.03.2003, 30 days', 1963, 18.11.2003, 20.04.2004, one month's, 1997, the second year

CARDINAL: 2., four, 10, 14, ten, five, five, five, five, five, five, 9.75, 6.3.2003, 212/216/2001, 31.12.2001, 2003.4, 2.5.2003, 11.2, 20.5.2003, 28.5.2003, 1, 23, 26.3.2004, 23, 11,21,50,000/-, 9.75, 1, 46, 6, 20.5.2003, 28.5.2003 to 5.7.2003, 27.10.2000, four, 1, 9, 1.2, 12.1 Termination, 16.1, 16.2, 12.1, 12, 15, four, 1.2, 14, two, 15, 12.1, two, two, 16, 16.2, 6.3.2003, 18, 19, about 14.04.2004, four, 20, 21, 21, 29.4.2004, 12.04.2005, 3, 19.4.04, 23, 23, 24

PERSON: Schedule, Operational Licence, Licence, Licensee, hereunder.10, Licensee, Licence, Licence, Licensee, Licence, Licensee, xxx xxx(iii, Licensee, Licensee, A. Sharan, Licensee, Licensee, Licensee, Pearey Lal v. Rameshwar Das, Anr, Appellant

PRODUCT: Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Agreement, Respondent, Appellant, Schedules, Agreement, Schedule, Agreement, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Respondent, 31.12.2001.The Appellate, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant

PERCENT: 15%, 4%

ORDINAL: second, first, third, third, third

LOC: Respondent, the Appellant, the Appellant, Respondent, Respondent, Licensor, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent

FAC: Licence Fee valid