Everest Advertising Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State, Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Decided On : Apr-10-2007

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Companies Act, Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 204 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 204 of the Code, Section 204, Section 202, Section 204 of the Code, Section 203, Section 203 of the Code, Section 203, Section 204, Section 141, Section 138, Section 141, Section 141, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141.11, Section 141, Section 138 of the Act, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141, Section 7/16

ORG: S.B. Sinha, the Delhi High Court, Dalmia Industries Ltd.', Company, Company, Accused No, Company, Accused No, Appellant - Company (Company, Director (Technical, Company, Company, Central Bank of India, the State Bank of Bikaner, Connaught Circus, the State Bank of Bikaner, Jaipur, D-72 Connaught Circus, Bank, the Banker of the complainant, Memo, Media Concessionaries, the Media Concessionaries, Magistrate, Magistrate, the High Court, the High Court, The Metropolitan Magistrate, Company, High Court, Magistrate, Respondents Nos, Respondents, Company, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Court, Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, The High Court, Magistrate, the Central Government or State Government, the Central Government, the Sate Government, and(b, Court, Court, S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd., the Managing Directors, Court, Company, Directors, the Directorship of the Company, Company, S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Directors, Company, Company, Court, S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Company, Accused No, Company, Court, Pepsi Foods Ltd., Magistrate, Company, the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Court, Court, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

NORP: J.1, Maharashtra

DATE: 13.07.2005, 3690, 3691, 1956, 17.07.1995, between the period July, 1997, December, 1997, 14.11.1997, 6.04.1998, 18.04.1998., 26.3.1998, 27.3.1998, 588184, 24.07.1999, 11.07.2001, the day to day, 24.07.1999, 2005CriLJ4529 ., 1881, fifteen days, 15.02.1995, the day to day, 15.02.1995, 17 months, 15 days, 1954

CARDINAL: 2001.3, 2, 3, 6, 6, 6, 2,59,21,053.37, 6, 2, 3, two, 2, 3, 1 to 5, 9, 28.3.1998, One, 6.11.1997, 28.3.1998, 11, 1, 13, 1 to 5, 1, 5., 24.07.1999, 2, 3, two, 2, 3, 6, 1, 2, 3, two, two, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1992CriLJ3779, 200, 202, 16, 3, 2004CriLJ4609, 9, 1, 1, 3, 2005CriLJ4140, 2, 2007CriLJ1419, 3, 1, 2, 2, 15.08.1996, two, 14, more than one, 15, more than one, 1, 5, 2, 3, 6, 2, 3, 1998CriLJ1, One, as many as 12, 1, only two, three

PERSON: Ram Tilak Nagar Branch, Jaipur D 72, Aloke Kumar Sengupta, K.T.S. Tulsi, Bench, K.K. Mathew v. State, Anr, Bench, Subramanium Sethuraman, Anr, N.K. Sharma v. Abhimanyu, Bench, Neeta Bhalla, Anr, Question, Kumar Poddar, Anr, Neeta Bhalla, Anr, Mishra, Kumar Poddar, Kumar Poddar, Shekhar Singh, Tulsi, Accused Nos, Respondent Nos, Respondent Nos, Tulsi, Anr, Directors

GPE: New Delhi, New Delhi, New Delhi, Counsel, Kerala, Delhi, that:(i

LOC: Act.12

PERCENT: 25%

WORK_OF_ART: The Flavors Fast Food and Cool Corner'

PRODUCT: Appellant No