Ram Sukh Vs. Dinesh Aggarwal

Decided On : Sep-18-2009

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, Section 80, Order VI Rules, Order VII Rule 11, Section 86, Section 83 of the Act, Section 83 of the Act, Section 86, the Returning Officers, the Returning Officers, Chapter VII, Section 83 of the Act, Section 100(1)(d)(iv, the Constitution Bench, Section 100 and Section 101, Section 81 or Section 82, Section 117.Explanation.--An, Section 98.(2, Section 80A.(3, Section 97, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 81, Section 100 of the Act, Section 83, Section 83, Section 86, Section 81 or Section 82 or Section 117 of the Act, Section 87, Section 83 of the Act, Section 83(1, Section 83 of the Act, Section 83, Order VI Rule, Order VII Rule 11, Section 83, Section 86, Section 86, Section 87 of the Act, Order VII Rule 11, Section 83, Section 86, Section 86, Section 81, Section 82 or Section 117 of the Act, Section 83, Section 86, Section 87, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 83(1)(a, Section 83(1)(a, Section 100(1)(d)(iv, Constitution, Constitution, Chapter VII, Section 83(1)(a, Section 100(1)(d)(iv, Section 100(1)(d)(iv

ORG: D.K. Jain, the High Court of Uttaranchal, the High Court, the State Legislative Assembly of Uttaranchal, Uttarakhand, Indian National Congress, the Nationalist Congress Party, Indian National Congress, Devband, Electronic Voting Machines, the Electronic Voting Machines, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Counsel, the High Court, Learned Counsel, the Handbook for Returning Officers, the Election Commission of India, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, C.K. Thakker, J., the High Court, Electorate, Court, Bench, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Supp, Court, Bench, the High Court, opinion--*****(d, High Court, congress candidate.12, Praroop, Laxman Chowk Legislative Assembly, the Election Commission, the Election Tribunal/High Court

NORP: J.1, Muslim, Muslim, P.M.

DATE: 1951, 15th January, 2008, 21st February, 2007, 27th February, 2007, 17, 1908, 17, 19, 20, 21, 2000, forty-five days, 1908, fourteen days, from day, the following day, six months, 1908, 1872, 1972, 2004, 81, 83 and, 1969, lost.14, 2007, 1972, 1908, 1986, 1977, one day, '21

PRODUCT: the `Act', Fatva, Para 12, Order VI Rule

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, second, first, first, first

CARDINAL: 2, Fatva, 16, 14, 8), 191, 1, 1954, 892, one, one, 1, more than one, two, 5, one, 2, 4, 5, 1, 1, 1, 7, 181, 86, three, 3, three, 1, 50)50, 16, two-fold, 1, 16, three, 1, 23)23, 315, 1, 2, 12, 2, 3.00, 13, two, two

PERSON: Manbir Singh Dagur, Singh v., Janmeja Singh, Counsel, Handbook, Jagan Nath v., Jaswant Singh, Sukaji Shivankar v., Ramaratan Bapu, Bench, Samant N. Balkrishna, Anr, George Fernandez, Bench, M. Hidayatullah, Particulars, Virender Nath Gautam v., Singh, facta probanda, Counsel, Bench, Hardwari Lal v. Kanwal Singh, A.N. Ray, J., Rajiv Gandhi, Samant N. Balkrishna, Udhav Singh, Madhav Rao Scindia

GPE: Mehr, Azhar Hussain

LOC: thereunder.10

QUANTITY: 3 SCC 617

PERCENT: more than 80%, 80%