Semantic Analysis by spaCy
India Leather Corporation (P) Ltd., Madras Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras
Decided On : Apr-30-1997
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 104(4, Section 104, the Explanation to Section 104(4, Section 104(4
ORG: ORDER1, ITR, Southern India Tanneries, Section 104 of the Income-tax Act, Section 104, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, The High Court, Court, Court, Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd., CIT, Section 104 of the Act, Counsel, Ashok Leyland Ltd., CIT, Court, Judicial Dictionary, the High Court, Tribunal, S.L.P.
DATE: 1989, February 14, 1978, 1975, the assessment year 1966-67, earlier years, the assessment year, 1961, the previous year ending December 31, 1965, previous year, previous year, 1980, 4141, 1981, 1982
CARDINAL: 179, 181, 33, 5,05,045, 3,73,870, 2,59,289, 1,00,000, 4, 3,73,870, 58,937, 3,99,13,372, 32,49,000, 181, 3,73,870, 3., one, 1978]113ITR84(SC, 4, less than fifty-one, 1978]113ITR84(SC, 1978]113ITR84(SC, 1997]224ITR122(SC, 223, 3,73,870, 8179, 8, 292
WORK_OF_ART: Tax Case No
ORDINAL: third, 5th
PERSON: Janaki Ramachandran, Stroud
GPE: Counsel, C.A.