Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

India Leather Corporation (P) Ltd., Madras Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras

Decided On : Apr-30-1997

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 104(4, Section 104, the Explanation to Section 104(4, Section 104(4

ORG: ORDER1, ITR, Southern India Tanneries, Section 104 of the Income-tax Act, Section 104, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, The High Court, Court, Court, Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd., CIT, Section 104 of the Act, Counsel, Ashok Leyland Ltd., CIT, Court, Judicial Dictionary, the High Court, Tribunal, S.L.P.

DATE: 1989, February 14, 1978, 1975, the assessment year 1966-67, earlier years, the assessment year, 1961, the previous year ending December 31, 1965, previous year, previous year, 1980, 4141, 1981, 1982

CARDINAL: 179, 181, 33, 5,05,045, 3,73,870, 2,59,289, 1,00,000, 4, 3,73,870, 58,937, 3,99,13,372, 32,49,000, 181, 3,73,870, 3., one, 1978]113ITR84(SC, 4, less than fifty-one, 1978]113ITR84(SC, 1978]113ITR84(SC, 1997]224ITR122(SC, 223, 3,73,870, 8179, 8, 292

WORK_OF_ART: Tax Case No

ORDINAL: third, 5th

PERSON: Janaki Ramachandran, Stroud

GPE: Counsel, C.A.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //