Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ashok Leyland Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Feb-20-1997

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 3, Constitution, Section 6-A of the Central Sales Tax Act, Section 6-A, Section 9, Section 16, Section 9(2, Section 6-A, Section 6-A, Section 6-A, Section 16, Section 9(2, Section 4, Section 6-A, Section 6-A, Article 269 of the Constitution, Article (vide Article 269(1)(g, Article 269, Article 269, Article 286 of the Constitution, Article 286, Article 286, Article 269, Article, Constitution (Sixth Amendment) Act, Section 5, Article 286, Article 269, Section 6, the Amendment Act 61 of 1972, Section 6-A, Section 9, Section 9, Article 269, Section 6-A, Rule 12, Section 6-A, Rule 12, Section 9, Section 16, Section 16, Section (1, Section 6-A, Section 6-A, Section 6-A, Section 16, Section 92, Section 6-A, Section 6-A(2, Section 16, Section 9, the Citizenship Act, Section 9, Rule 3, Section 9(2, Section 18, Article 19(1)(e, Constitution, the Citizenship Act, Section 3(2, Section 3(4, Section 29-B of the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, Section 6-A, Section 9(2, Section 6-A(2, Section 16, Section 16, Section 4, Section 16, Section 9(2, Section 8(2-A, Article 32 of the Constitution, Article 32

PERSON: Jeevan Reddy, Madras, Bangalore, Pondicherry, S.T.Us, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, Prayer, S.T.Us, notice.3, Sri K. Parasaran, Tamil Nadu, himself.(2)(a, S.T.U., S.T.Us, S.T.U., Sri Parasaran, Jamshedpur, Anr, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, Sri Parasaran, Sri Parasaran, Sri Parasaran, Ahmad Khan, Dharam Das v. State of Punjab, Sikh Gurudwara, Sri Parasaran, Anr, Fazl Ali, J., Sri Parasaran, Anr, Sri Parasaran, Chunni Lal Parshadi Lal v. Commissioner, Lucknow, S.T.Us, Sri Parasaran, Sri Parasaran, S.T.U., Sri Parasaran, Tamil Nadu, S.T.U., Tamil Nadu, Sri Parasaran, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu

NORP: J.1, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, intra-State, inter-State, inter-State, Rules, Maharashtra, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, Maharashtra, inter-State, intra-State, inter-State, inter-State

ORG: Ashok Leyland Limited, herein1, the State of Tamil Nadu, Vijayawada Pune, State Transport Undertakings, R.S.O., Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, the State of Andhra Pradesh, the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, the State of Tamil Nadu, the State of Tamil Nadu, the Central Sales Tax Act, the State of Tamil Nadu, State, the Central Sales Tax Act, State, State, State, the State of Tamil Nadu, Central, the State of Tamil Nadu, the High Court, State, the State of Tamil Nadu, State, State, The High Court, State, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the High Court, the High Court, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, Forms, State, State, the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax, Forms, R.S.O., R.S.O., the Sate Transport Undertakings, R.S.O., the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, Forms, State Transport Undertakings, State, State, State, State, State, Head Office, State, State, State, the Sale of Goods Act, State, S.T.U., Central, State, State, State, Form, Court, State, State, Court, the Union of India, Sri A.K. Ganguly, the State of Tamil Nadu, State, the Head Office, R.S.O., Central, the Tamil Nadu, the Government of India, Parliament, Parliament, the Consolidated Fund of India, Parliament, Parliament, State, State, Parliament, State, Parliament, the Central Sales Tax Act, State, Court, Tata Engineering, Locomotive Company Limited, the Central Sales Tax Act, State, the Central Sales Tax Act, State, The Central Sales Tax Act, State, State, Central, State, the Central Government, the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turn-Over) Rules, State, R.S.O., State, Central, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, Clauses, State, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, Parliament, Parliament, Court, The High Court, un, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act ', Union of India, Central Government, the Central Government, Court, Court, Court, Court, Sodhi Transport, S.C.R., State, State, State, State, State, State, Balabhagas Hulaschand, State, State, State, State, State, the Central Sales Tax Act, Court, Sahney Steel, Press Works Ltd., Sahney Steel and Press:Considerable, Court, State, State, State, State, the Central Sales Tax Act, State X. Apparently, Hyderabad, State, Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Press, the Tamil Nadu State, Sahney Steel and Press, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, Coimbatore, Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Hyderabad, the State of Andhra Pradesh, State, Hyderabad, State, Hyderabad, State, Sales Tax, Court, Slate, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, State Transport Undertakings, State, State, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, State, State, Maharashtra S.T.U., R.S.O., R.S.O., Forms, the State of Tamil Nadu, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, State, State, State, Central, State, State, the Tamil Nadu State, Sales Tax, Central, The Maharashtra State, Maharashtra S.T.U., the Bombay Sales Tax Act, the State of Maharashtra, the Tamil Nadu State, State, Maharashtra Sales Tax, Court, Bharat Heavy Electrical Limited v. Union of India, State, State, State, State, State, the Central Sales Tax Act, State, the Central Government, the State Government, the Central Government, the Central Sales Tax Act, Sales Tax, State, State, B.H.E.L., Court, Court, the High Court, State, the High Court, State, State, B.H.E.L., Court, Court, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, State, State, Court, Court, the Government of India, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Central, the State of Tamil Nadu, the State of Tamil Nadu, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Central, State, Ashok Leyland

GPE: India, States, Trivandrum, Bhuvaneshwar, Gauhati, Andhra, States, States, States, States, Counsel, States, States, States, States, Counsel, Clause, Clause, Clause, States, States, India, Izhar, India, India, India, Orissa, Balabhagas Hulaschand, Balabhagas, Orissa, Bombay, States, Andhra, Counsel, States, States, States

PRODUCT: Calcutta, F' Form, F' Forms, F, F, F, commerce'.6, F, F, Sahney, Calcutta, F, F

PERCENT: almost seventy percent, thirty percent

DATE: the years, 16 32 and, any financial year, that year, 1956, 1956, April 1, 1973, 1970, 1957, Rule 3(1)(a, 1)(a, the year, the year, five years, 1955, 1925, 19861, 1986, year, year, tomorrow, a period of, eight weeks, State.25

LOC: Articles 269, S.T.Us, S.T.Us, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, S.T.Us

CARDINAL: 286, one, 55, 2, 2A, two, two, one, one, 2, 1, 92, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 3, 3, 20, 354, one, 1, one, 1, 2, 2A, 1, 2, 12, 5, 1, 6, 5, transferee, 8), transferee, 2, 1, two, 2, five, five, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 2, one, 32, 1, 2, 30, 3, 3, 1975]3SCR160, 939, 1976]2SCR939, one, 1976]2SCR939, 62, 112, 239, more than one, 136, 142, 1

WORK_OF_ART: F' Forms, 'Case No

FAC: Tamil Nadu, the Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, the Tamil Nadu, the Tamil Nadu, the Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu Sale Tax, the Tamil Nadu, the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first

EVENT: the Tamil Nadu Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //