M. Balakrishna Reddy Vs. Director, Cbi, New Delhi

Decided On : Mar-14-2008

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 511, the Indian Penal Code, the Delhi Act', the Delhi Act, Article 166 of the Constitution, Article, the Delhi Act, the Delhi Act, Section 6, the Delhi Act, Section 6, the Delhi Act, the Delhi Act, the Delhi Act, Article 166 of the Constitution and, the Delhi Act, the Delhi Act, Section 6, the Delhi Act, Section 1, Section 2, Section 5, Section 3.(2, Section 6, Section 5, the Delhi Act, Section 3 (Section 5, the Indian Penal Code, Section 5, Section 3 and 5, Section 6, Section 6, the Delhi Act, Section 6, Section 6, the Delhi Act, Article 166 of the Constitution, Article 166 of the Constitution on, Constitution, Article 166 of the Constitution, Article 166 of the Constitution, Article 166, Article 166, Article 166, Article 166, Article 166 of the Constitution, Article 166, Constitution, the Preventive Detention Act, Article 32 of the Constitution, The Constitution Bench, Article 166 of the Constitution, Section 3, the Preventive Detention Act, Article 166(1, Constitution, the Preventive Detention Act, Article 32 of the Constitution, Article 166 of the Constitution.25, Preventive Detention Act, the - Reference, Section 9, the Preventive Detention Act, Article 166(1, Article 166(1, Constitution, Article 166, Article are not, the Preventive Detention Act, Section 11, Article 166, Section 11, Constitution, article 166 of the Constitution, article 166, Article 166 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 166, Constitution, Article 166 of the Constitution since, Article 166, Section 6, Article 77 of the Constitution, Section 6, Section 197, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 6(1)(a, Article 77 of the Constitution, Article 77 of the Constitution, Article 77, Article 166 of the Constitution, Article 77, Article 77, Article 166, Article 166 of the Constitution, Article 166(1, Article 166(1, Article, Article 77, Article 166, Article 166 of the Constitution as, Article 166 of the Constitution, Article 166 of the Constitution.46, Article 166(1, Article 166 of the Constitution came, the Land Acquisition Act, Article 166(3, Constitution, Article 166(3, Constitution, Article 166(2, Rule 12, Article 166(1, Rule 13, Article 77(2, Article 77(2, Article 166 of the Constitution, Article 166(1, A Constitution Bench, Article 166, Article 166 of the Constitution, Constitution, the Constitution Bench, Article 166 of the Constitution is, Article 166 of the Constitution, the Constitution Bench, Article 166(1, Constitution, Article 166, Article enables the Governor, Rule 25, Article 166, Constitution, the Constitution Bench, Article 166 of the Constitution, the Constitution Bench, Article 166 ', Section 482, the Delhi Act, the Delhi Act, Article 166 of the Constitution and, Article 166 of the constitution.62, Section 6, the Delhi Act, Section 6, the Delhi Act, Section 5, Section 6, the Delhi Act, Section 6, Section 6, the Delhi Act

ORG: C.K. Thakker, Special Magistrate, CBI, Madhya Pradesh, the High Court of, Madhya Pradesh, Criminal Revision No, the Union Public Service Commission, Hamidiya Arts and Commerce College, the Examination Board, UPSC Head Office, UPSC, IPC, the Court of Special Magistrate, Central Bureau of Investigation, CBI, the State of Madhya Pradesh, CBI, the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, the State Government, the State of Madhya Pradesh, CBI, Magistrate, the High Court of, Madhya Pradesh, the High Court, the Revision Petition, Court, Registry, the High Court, CBI, the High Court, the State of Madhya Pradesh, Police Authorities, State, the State Government, the State Government, the 'State Government', CBI, the High Court, CBI, UPSC Examination, The High Court, Indian Forest Services Examination, UPSC, Indian Forest Services, Central Government, Central Government, CBI, The High Court, the Government of Madhya Pradesh, the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, CBI, Court, the Revisional Court, the High Court, the State of Madhya Pradesh, CBI, dismissed.8, the High Court, the Head Office, Central Government, CBI, the State Government of Madhya Pradesh, the Central Government, the Preamble of the Act, Special Police Establishment, the Central Government, Special Police Establishment, Special Police Establishment:-The Central Government, the Delhi Special Police, Special Police Establishment, the Central Government, Special Police Establishment, Special Police Establishment, The Central Government, State, the Delhi Special Police Establishment, the Central Government, the Delhi Special Police Establishment, Sub-Inspector, the Central Government, State Government, State, Union Territory, the State Government, the Delhi Special Police Establishment, State, the Government of that State.12, CBI, State, Union Territory, Railway Area, the State Government, Special Police Establishment, State, the Central Government, Delhi Special Police Establishment, the Central Government, Delhi Special Police Establishment, State, the State Government, Delhi Special Police Establishment, the Central Government, IPC, M.C. Sahni, Superintendent of Police, CBI, IPC, the Central Govenrment, Special Police Establishment, the State of Madhya Pradesh, IPC, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the State Government, the State of Madhya Pradesh, the State Government, the Government of Madhya Pradesh, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, 5th February, the State Government, the Special Police Establishment, State, this State Government, the Delhi State Police Establishment, the State Government, the Delhi State Police Establishment, the State of Madhya Pradesh, the State Government, the State of Madhya Pradesh, Central Government, the Superintendent of Police, CBI, the State of Madhya Pradesh, the Central Government, the Special Leave Petition, G97, Madhya PradeshHome (Police, Govt, Ministry of Home Affairs, 5th February, the State Government, the Special Police Establishment, State, this State Government, the Delhi Special Police Establishment, State, Sd/-R.N., the Government of a State, the Government of a State, the Government of the State, the Government of a State, the Government of the State, Conduct of Government Business', the Government of the State', Court, Court, Court, Court, State, Court, the State Government, the Government of a State, Home, the District Magistrate, Court, Court, the State Government, Government, Home Department, ToThe District Magistrate, the Advisory Board, theGovernment of Bombay,Home Department.26, the Federal Court, J. K. Gas Plant, Ors, King-Emperor, FCR, S.R. Das, Attorney- General, State, Government, the Government of a State, the Government of a State, State, Clauses, State, Court, Court, State, Court, Court, Government, Court, Travancore-Cochin, the High Court, Court, Raj Pramukh, Government, the United State of Travancore-Cochin, the Rules of Business, Court, Clauses, Court, State, Government, Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd., State Industrial Tribunal, U.P., Court, Court, the Delhi Police Establishment, the Home Department of the Government of Bombay, the Government of India, the Delhi Special Police Establishment, Court, the Delhi Police Establishment, Court, the State Government, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Central Government, Central Government, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Court, the Central Government, the Government of India, the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Government of India.-(1, the Government of India, the Government of India, the Government of India, the Government of a State, Court, Court, Court, the Government of India, Court, the Government, Education Department, the State of Mysore, Selection Board, Government, the Education Department, the Selection Committee, Engineering Colleges and Technical Institutions, Government, Government, the State Government, State of Uttar Pradesh v. Om Prakash Gupta, Court, the State Government, Court, the Government of the State, the Business Rules, Government, the Business Rule 12, Bombay this Court, the Central Government, the Central Government, Government, Court, the State Government, Court, the State Government, Cabinet, Cabinet, State, the High Court, Cabinet, Cabinet, Cabinet, Cabinet, Cabinet, State, the Council of Ministers, State, the Council of Ministers, the Council of Ministers, State, Court, Court, the State of Pepsu, the State Government, the State of Pepsu, the State of Punjab, the High Court, Court, the State Government, the Government of a State, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, State, State, Court, the State Government, the State Government, Court, State, the Rules of Business, State, State, Council of Ministers, the Council of Ministers, State, the Council of Ministers, State, the Council of Ministers, the State Government, Court, the State of Punjab v., the Council of Ministers, the Council of Ministers, Council, State, the Council of Ministers, State of Bihar and Ors, the State Government, Court, Chitralekha, CBI, the First Information Report, FIR, the High Court, inter alia, the State Government under Section 6, Delhi Special Police Establishment, State, State, CBI, The High Court, CBI, the High Court, Court, Court, the State Government, Court, the Superintendent of Police, CBI, the Central Government, the State Government, the Central Government, Special Police Establishment, the Central Government, Special Police Establishment, State Government, the State Government, Parliament, the State Government, the State of Madhya Pradesh, CBI, Court, the High Court

NORP: J.1, MISHRADeputy, Punjab, President.(2, R., Rules, R.

DATE: December 17, 2002, 2002, January 2, 2007, the year 1996, November 1, 1996, 1860, 1946, December 17, 2002, 1973, March 8, 2007, August 6, 2007, the Head Quarter, 1993, February 5, 1957, February 5, 1957, station.11, September 7, 1989, 420, 467, February 18, 1963, February 5, the 29th December, 1956, February 5, 1957, the 29th December, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1950, 28th April, 1951, 1950, 1187, the 23rd February, 1951, 1950, question.29, 1961)IILLJ419SC, August 13, 1949, 1946, the 6th November, 1946, 1947, 1898, 1947, 1947, the 25th June, 1963, 1894, the next day, 34, 1973, so.66

CARDINAL: 176, 2003.3, 420, 471, 474, 467, 468, 417, two, 1, 1, 2, two, 417, 418, 468, 471, 474, 511, 1957.15, 1957Sub, 20/12(II)/Home, 20/12(II)/Home, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 756, One, 1952CriLJ955, One, 1, 11, 2, 3., 141, 1, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1952CriLJ1269, 1, One, seven, 1956)ILLJ235SC, One, 1, 2, thus:.I, 5042/4, 1, 2, 1964]6SCR368, 2, 2, 2, 2003]2SCR933, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, three, 18-3-1993, two, 2, 3, two, 1, one, 1961]2SCR371, two, 1987CriLJ1860, 57, 2006CriLJ4050, two

GPE: New Delhi, Bhopal, Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, the Union Territories, India, States, States, New Delhi, Govt, India, New Delhi, India, SECRETARY, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Rajpramukh, Bombay, Bombay.37, Clause, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Singh v. State of Punjab, Pepsu, Qanungo, C.M., Pepsu, Rajpramukh, Rajpramukh, Rajpramukh, Gujarat, C.B.I.

PRODUCT: Revision under Section 397, Ministers

FAC: Railway

ORDINAL: first, first, first

PERSON: Schedule, Schedule, Ujgar Singhand Anr, Chandrasekhara Aiyar, Dattatreya Moreshwar Pangarkar v. State, Surat, Bombay Castle, Surat, Shri Dattatreya, Moreshwar Pangarkar, Sd/-G. K. Kharkar, Mukherjea, J., Jog Naik, Bench, P. Joseph John v. State of, Joseph John, Dattatreya Moreshwar, Dattatreya Moreshwar, E.G. Barsay v. State, Barsay, Major E. G. Barsay, Shri H. S. Kochhar, M. Gopala Menon, Sd/- S. NARASAPPA, E.G. Barsay v. State, J.P. Bansal v. State, Anr, Court, L.G. Chaudhari, Sodhi Sukhdev Singh, Bachhittar Singh v. State of Punjab, Bachhittar Singh, Sodhi Sukhdev Singh, Gopal Singh, Kripalu Shankar, Bachhittar Singh, Bachhittar Singh, Order, Bachhittar Singh, Bachhittar Singh, Bachhittar Singh, Kripalu Shankar, J.P. Bansal v. State, Ravi Shankar Srivastava, Ravi Shankar, Ravi Shankar

LOC: Govt, Govt, Secretariat, Rajpramukh, Rajpramukh, Rajpramukh

MONEY: 166(1, 25 per cent, 166(1

TIME: minutes