M/S Bridgestone India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Inderpal Singh

Decided On : Nov-24-2015

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 177, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 482, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 482, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 142 of the Act, Section 138, Section 177 CrPC, Section 138, Section 220(1, Section 184 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 182(1, Section 1(2, Section 3, Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 4, Section 142A, the Negotiable Instruments Act, section 142, section 142, section 142, Section 142(2, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 4, Section 142A, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 142A., Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 142(2)(a, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 142A(1, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 142(2, Section 142A(1

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, No.1950, the Union Bank of India,, Bridgestone India Pvt, Bridgestone India Pvt.Ltd., the IDBI Bank in Indore, the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, the Judicial Magistrate, the Union Bank of India, Chandigarh, the Judicial Magistrate, Bridgestone Indian Pvt.Ltd., The Judicial Magistrate, Court, the Judicial Magistrate, the High Court of, the High Court, the Judicial Magistrate, The Judicial Magistrate, M/s Bridgestone India Pvt.Ltd., the Judicial Magistrate, the High Court of, The High Court, Court, No.1950, the Union Bank of India, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Court, State of, Court, Court, Court, the High Court of, Court, the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment, the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment, the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment, hereunder:“3, the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Ordinance, the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Ordinance, Emphasis, Court, Court, Court, the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment, Court, Court, No.1950, the Union Bank of India,, the IDBI Bank, Indore, the Judicial Magistrate, the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, the Judicial Magistrate, the Judicial Magistrate, Criminal Appeal No.1563, No.10019, this Court in Criminal Appeal No.1557 of, Bridgestone India Pvt.Ltd., Court, M/s Bridgestone India Pvt.Ltd.

DATE: 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 04.08.2006, 26.08.2006, 06.09.2006, 1881, 15 days, 13.10.2006, 02.06.2009, 02.06.2009, 1881, 2014, 58, 1881, a period of, one month, a period of, six months, thirty days, fifteen days, 2015, 15.06.2015, 2015, 1881, 2015, 1973, 2015, 2015, 1881, 2015, 1973, 2015, 02.05.2006, 04.08.2006, 1881, 2015, 2011, 2015, 2011, 2015, 2011, 2015

PERSON: VERSUS INDERPAL, Chandigarh, Inderpal Singh, Inderpal Singh, Inderpal Singh, Madhya Pradesh, Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan, Inderpal Singh, Inderpal Singh, Inderpal Singh, Chandigarh, Bench, hereunder:“58, Ordinance, jurisdiction,--, Chandigarh, Madhya Pradesh, Inderpal Singh, Inderpal Singh

CARDINAL: 1, 1881.6, 05.05.2011, three, 9, 1, 58.2, 58.3, 58.4, 58.5, 58.6, 58.7, 184, 220, 05.05.2011, 3 and 4, 142, 1, 1, 2, 4, 142A., 1, 2, 2, 2, 142, 1, 2, 142, 1, 3, more than one, 2, 1, 1, 05.05.2011, 15.01.2016, 1, 2011)[M, 24.11.2015, 24.11.2015

GPE: K.Bhaskaran, NEW DELHI

PRODUCT: Section 138, Section 138, Section 138

ORDINAL: first