Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Debichand Mohallal Vs. Income-tax Officer

Decided On : Mar-16-1994

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Patna

LAW: Section 143(3, Section 68, Section 68, Section 131, Section 131, Section 131, Section 131 Issued, Section 131, Section 24

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 19,684, 19,667, 19,717, 9)(4, 19,667, 6-11-1987, 6-11-1987, three, one, one, 154, 151, 150, 17, 154, 3, 159, 783, 83, 162, 484, 130, 145, 183, 103ITR 344, three, 1978, 114, 689

ORG: not.2, ITO, Nandita Kumari Agarwal Rs, ITO, ITO, ITO, ITO, M.P. Agarwal, ITO, Lordship Justice, CIT, Hanuman Agarwal, the Patna High Court, CIT v. Bahri Bros., CIT, ITR, the Supreme Court, CIT, SC, ITO, Rattan Lai, ITR, SC, ITO, the Supreme Court, Sarogi Credit Corpn.v, CIT, the Calcutta High Court, Shankar Industries, CIT

DATE: 13)(2, the same day, the year, 1985, 1984, 1985, 244 22, 1986, 11986, 1981, 61, 1984, 25, 1965, 1976

PERSON: Shri Jain, Jain, Rule 46A, Jain, S.K. Jha, Addl, Pat, Addl, Orissa Corpn.(P., Das, K.D. Arora v., Pat, Das, Kanhaiyalal, Jain, Das, Pat

GPE: Counsel

ORDINAL: first, first, fourth, third

PRODUCT: 349

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //