Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

R.T. Balasubramaniam Vs. Income-tax Officer

Decided On : Jan-28-1994

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

LAW: Section 148, Section 148, Section 246(1, Section 246, Shri V.Ramachandran, the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, Section 246, the IT Act, Shri V.Ramachandran, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the IT Act, Section 246(1, Section 246(1

ORG: AR, CIT, Indian Express, Madurai, P) Ltd., ITP, the DC (Appeals, the DC (Appeals, ITP, The DC (Appeals, AR, ITO, the DC (Appeals, ITO, the DC (Appeals, Tribunal, the DC (Appeals, the DC (Appeals, Assessing, the DC (Appeals, the DC (Appeals, Tribunal, the DC (Appeals, ITP, The Bombay High Court, CIT, ITR, CIT, The Supreme Court, Esthuri Aswathiah, CIT, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Assessing, The Bombay High Court, CIT, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, The Bombay High Court, The Kerala High Court, CFT, Assessing, The Kerala High Court, Jayasree Chit Funds &amp, CIT, ITR, Supreme Court, Madras High Court, City Civil Court, Delhi Courts, Karnataka Courts, Andhra Pradesh Courts, Advocate, Court, CPC, Department, Jayasree Chit Funds &amp, Kerala High Court, Tribunal, the Chartered Accountant, ITO, the High Court, the High Court, Shri R.T. Balasubramaniam, Department, Ramanlal Kamdar, CIT, ITR, The High Court, Appellate, Appellate, Tribunal, the Department, the Bombay High Court, Dayaram Vasudeo's, the High Court, Smt, the Supreme Court, Esthuri Aswathiah, Tribunal, Jayasree Chit Finds &amp, Department, Chemmeens (Regd, CIT, Indian Express, Madurai, ITR, State of, Ramanlal Kamdar, the High Court, ITP, ITO, Ramanlal Kamdar, Lordships, Appellate, Appellate, Jauasree Chit Funds &amp, Kerala High Court, inter alia, The Bombay High Court, Dayaram, inter alia, Tribunal, Punjab &, Haryana High Court, Chhat Mull Aggarwal, CIT, inter alia, AAC, Indian Express, Madurai) P. Ltd., Tribunal, Tribunal, Department, Tribunal, Tribunal, Indian Express, Madurai) P. Ltd.

DATE: all the assessment years, 1983, 1985-86, 1988-89, 19,5701986-87 20,5501987-88, 17,9301988-89 15,520, the relevant years, all the assessment years, four years, 1992, 1970, 1967, 1967, 1991, 1981, the relevant year, 1908, 1976, 1961, all the assessment years, years, 4, 1961, 1983, 1982, 5150, 5151, 1961, years, the assessment years, the assessment years, 1979

CARDINAL: 140, 23, 14-6-1989, 86, 14, 15, 193, 75, 66, 478, 50,000, 1,35,000, 65, 188, 127, six, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1, 3, three, 1, 3, 7, 1977, 108, 73, 2, 6, 8, 50,000, 140, 705, 51, 22,000, 25,000, 116, two, one

GPE: Asst, Asst, Andhra, Karnataka, Vakalatnama, India, Delhi, Karnataka, Chaturvedi, Pithisaria, assessee, England

PERSON: Additon madeRs.1985-86, Shri V.Ramachandran, Dayaram Vasudeo, Parbati Devi v., Jivatlal Pwtapshi v., Madras, Vakalatnamas, Andhra Pradesh Vakalatnamas, Tirupur, Shri V. Ramachandran, Shri V. Ramachandran, Parbati Devi's, Jivatlal Purtapshi, Vakalatnamas, Tamil Nadu v.Arulmurugan &amp, Vakalatnamas, Shri V. Ramachandran, Tirupur, Shri V. Ramachandran, Shri V. Ramachandran

TIME: 24,0001988-89 25,000

ORDINAL: first, first, second, second

WORK_OF_ART: Chemmeens (Regd, Fourth Edition, Volume 5, the Chartered Accountant

QUANTITY: 1-2-

EVENT: Section 288, Section 288

PRODUCT: 381, Section 246, 694

NORP: American

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //