Mustaq Ahmed Mohammed Isak and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Decided On : May-08-2009

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 12, Section 12, the MCOC Act, Section 21(2)(b, Section 21(2)(b, Section 21, Section 2 of the Code and 'Cognizable Case', Section 167 of the Code, Section 20(4, Section 167 of the Code of the Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 20, Section 167 of the Code, Section 20(4, Section 167 of the Code, Section 20, Section 20, Section 20, Section 20(4, Section 20(4, Section 20(4, Section 20(4, Section 20(8, Section 20(8, Section 20(4, Section 20(4, Section 20(8, Section 20(8, Section 20, Section 20(8, the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 20(8, Section 20(9, The Constitution Bench, Section 20 of the Act, Section 20(7, Section 20(8, Section 20(9, Section 20(8, Section 437 of the Code, Section 20(8, Section 20(8, Section 20(8, Section 20(4, the TADA Act, Section 20(8, Section 20(4, Section 20(4)(bb, Section 167, Section 167 CrPC, Section 20(4)(bb, Constitution Bench, Section 20(4)(bb, Section 167 CrPC, Section 21(2)(b, Section 120B, Section 4, Explosive Substances Act, Indian Arms Act, Section 10, 13, Section 23(2, Section 3(1, Section 21(b, Section 12, Section 21(2)(b, Section 21(1, Section 21, Section 21, Section 12, Section 21(2)(b, the MCOC Act, Section 167(2, Section 167(2, Section 167 of Code and Section 21, Section 21, Section 167 of Code, Section 167(2, the MCOC Act, Section of MCOC Act

NORP: J.1, Terrorists

ORG: the Bombay High Court, the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, Special Court, the Special Court, Criminal Appeal 736 of, Special Court, the Special Court, Special Court, the Special Court, the Special Court, State, the High Court, The High Court, Learned Counsel, Special Court, Learned Counsel, Court, Ors, the Special Court, Learned Counsel, Court, Hussainara Khatoon, Ors, v. Home, State of Bihar, Court, Disruptive Activities, the Designated Court, TADA, Designated Court, the Designated Court, the Designated Court, TADA, TADA, Additional Solicitor General, the State of Maharashtra, the Public Prosecutor, the Public Prosecutor, TADA, the Designated Court, Limitations, the Designated Court, TADA, a Designated Court, a Designated Court, a Designated Court, the High Court, the Court of Session', a Designated Court, TADA, TADA, TADA, Thakur, High Court, The Special Court, the High Court, the Special Court, The High Court, Sumo Jeepon Verul-Aurangabad Road, RDXetc, IPC r.w, UnlawfulActivities (Prevention) Act, MustakAhmed, AdditionalC.M.M. 2nd, 24.5.200622.5.2006 Competent Authority, presentoffence.24.5.2006 Thereafter, MCOC, Court, PCR, upto 4.7.2006MCR, MA No.260 of2006, Remand Application No, SpecialPublic Prosecutor Smt, MCOC SpecialCourt, MCOC Special Court, SPP, State, ACP Dhawale, Competent Authority, 7.8.20067.8.2006 Application of Public Prosecutor, MCOCSpecial Court, Upto 21.8.2006, P.P., LearnedDefence Advocate, ACP Dhawale, RemandApplication No, ofRemand Application, MCOC Special Court, Special PPSmt, MCOC Court, MCOC Special Court, SPP, State, Adv, Nos.15, Adv, Calcutta, Adv, MCOC Special Court, ACP Dhawale, MCOCSpecial Court, MCOC Special Case No.16C/2006.Whereas 7, MCOC Special Court, MCOC Special Courtby, Bail, CriminalAppeal, MCOC, ACP Dhawale, CriminalAppeal, the Bombay High Court, the High Court, Criminal Appeal No.736, Bombay High Court, Criminal Appeal No.736, CriminalAppeal, r.w., Criminal Procedure Code.15, the Special Court, Bail Application No, High Court, Special Court, the Special Court, the High Court

CARDINAL: 4.9.2006, 32, 17, 996, 5 to 8, 3, 736, 5 to 8, 7.8.2001, 260, 32, 3.8.2006, 4.9.2006, 4.9.2006, 996, 4.9.2006, 1, 2, 2),-, one hundred and ninety days, ninety, 1995CriLJ517, 1979CriLJ1052, 21, 22, 4, 4, 4, 4, two, two, 9, 8), 8), 9, 8), two, 8), 9, 704, 344)Though, 704, 345)Reverting, two, 20(8, 30, 1995CriLJ477, 48, 736, 7.8.2006, 32, 10, 30, LAC 3/06, 5, 5, 9, 9B, 3, 25, 23, 5, 5 to 8, 6.6.2006PCT, 12.6.2006MCR, 21.6.2006MCR, 17.7.2006MCR, 25.7.200hMCR, 17, 17, 3.8.2006, 2),(4, 3000, 10, 21.8.2006.Confession, 54, 4.9.2006, 17, 15, 4.9.2006, two, 2, 12, 16, 8, 11, 14, two, 15, 15, 7, 4.9.2006, 16, 5, 8), 16, 17, 18 and 19, 5 to 8, 32, 4.9.2006, 4.9.2006, 5 to 8, 2006were, 180, 4.9.2006, 32, 7.8.2006, 4.9.2006, 4.9.2006, 4.9.2006

DATE: 2006, 2006, 2006, 1999, 21.8.2006, 15 days, 2006, 21.8.2006, 2006, 2006, 2006, 90 days, 2006, 2006, 13.5.2006, 1999, 6.8.2006, 7.8.2006, 15 days, 21.8.2006, 21.8.2006, 2006, another 90 days, 180 days, 90 days, 90 days, 90 days, less than 90 days, 180 days, fifteen days', sixty days', thirty days' and 'ninety days', ninety days, 90 days, 90 days.11, 1987, 49, 180 days, 2006, 15 days, the day, 3.8.2006, 7.8.2006, 90 days, 6.8.2006, 21.8.2006, 2006, 4.9.2006.14, 24th March, 2008, 2000, 9.5.2006 to 10.5.200610.5.2006, 1908r.w, 6, 4, 1959r.w, 16, 18, 1967, 1999, 90 days, 2006, another 30 days, 2006, 2006, 90 days, 93 days, 90 days, 2006, 15 days, 90 days, 3.8.2006, 15 days, 15 days, 2006, 2006, 2006, 21.8.2006, 2006, 2006, 1999, 2006, 21.8.2006, 34, 9, 10, 13, 266/2006, 90 days, 90 days, 7.8.2006, 15 days, 2006, 2006, 2006, 2006, 2006, 2006, 2006, Para 30, 1999, 13.5.2006, 7.8.2006, a period of, 15 days, 21.8.2006, 21.8.2006, 15 days, 4.9.2006, 1999, 4.9.2006, 18.8.2006, 18.8.2006, 21.8.2006, 21.8.2006, 18.8.2006, 7.8.2006, 21.8.2006, 21.8.2006, that day

PERSON: Nos, Nos, Hitendra Vishnu Thakur, Thakur, Madhava Reddy, Sanjay Dutt v. State, Naranjan Singh Nathawan, Ram Narayan, A.K. Gopalan v. Government, Hitendra Vishnu Thakur, AlMohammed Amir Shakil Ahmed, Indian Explosive Act,1884 r.w, Accused Nos, Javed Ahmed, Afzal Khan, Riyaz Ahmed, Mazgaon, Rohini Salian, Rohini Salian, Salian, Suptd.of Arthur, Roznama, theLearned Spl, Azmi, Solkar, Moobin Solkar, JC, P. P. Smt, Rohini Salian, MA, RI/3, Rohini Salian, Salian, Khan, Momin Solkar, Sandip Sarpande, Amin Solkar, Biyamane, Bandarkar, Shahid Azmi, Nos, Misc, Spl, Momin Solkar, Kanse, Nos, Nos, Nos, Uttam Chopane

ORDINAL: second, first, first, second, first, second, second, first, first, first, first, first, second, second, first, second, first, first

GPE: MA, Remand, Kartar, Singh, Usmanbhai, C.B.I., Singh v. State of Delhi, MA, Roznama, Ld, Ld, RA, Roznama, Bengal, Mumbai

LOC: Single

TIME: under this Act, 4.9.2006 i.e., 4.9.2006 i.e.

PRODUCT: TADA, the `Code', No.8

WORK_OF_ART: State of Punjab, Challenging

FAC: Bombay High Court.10

QUANTITY: 1 present