Cholan Roadways Limited Vs. G. Thirugnanasambandam

Decided On : Dec-17-2004

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: a Division Bench, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 10, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 33(2(b, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 11, the Industrial Disputes Act, Rule 173-Q of the Central Excise Rules

ORG: S.B. Sinha, Court, the Industrial Tribunal, dismissed.2, The Motor Vehicles Claims Tribunal, Madras, Corporation, Ex.P-9, the Industrial Tribunal the Appellant, Industrial Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the Apex Court, State, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, Appellant, Tribunal, Court, Divisional Controller KSRTC, NWKRTC, Court, Bareilly Electricity Supply Co. Ltd., The Workmen and Ors, Union of India, under:'(2, the Industrial Tribunal under Section 33(2)(b, the Industrial Tribunal under Section 33(2)(b, CRC Tanjore Town Branch, Industrial Tribunal, Industrial Tribunal, Tribunal, Industrial Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the Industrial Tribunal, Maharastra State Board of Secondary, Education, Tribunal, Court, Martin Burn Ltd., the Industrial Tribunal, the Industrial Tribunal, Tribunal, See Buckingham & Carnatic Co. Ltd., The Workers of the Company, Ors, Ginning & Pressing Co. Pvt. Ltd., Court, A.T. Mane, Court, Karnataka State Road Transport Corpn, Court, Court, Court, State, Court, Reliance, Court, A.T. Mane, the Labour Court, Bareilly Electricity Supply Co. Ltd., Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, M/s Hari Vishnu Packaging Ltd., Board, the Appellate Tribunal, Industrial Tribunal, the High Court, the Industrial Tribunal, Industrial Tribunal, State, the Home Department, Judicial Review, Industrial Tribunal, the Industrial Tribunal, Respondents, Respondents, dismissal.38

NORP: J.1, holding:'Thus

CARDINAL: 6.6.2001, 29.4.88, 125, 7, 300, 80, 7, 9, 18.5.85, about 300, seven, about 10, Rs.30,000/-, two, two, 29.4.88, 7, 11, 1971)IILLJ407SC, 2000)ILLJ728SC, three, two, only 4, 10, 10, 3, 81, 29.4.88, 4, two, 1991]1SCR773, 81, 1977]3SCR372, 2, 36, 50, as many as 35, 264:'Now, one, 2.3.1995, 788.36

GPE: W.A., Singh, negligently.15, Singh, negligently.27, Rattan, Singh, Zunjarrao, appeal.42

LOC: Single, Respondent, Single Judge, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Single, Single, Respondent, Single Judge

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Appellant

PERSON: Tamil Nadu, Madras, Venkatesan, Poondi, Enquiry, Haryana, Anr, K. Ramamurthy, A.T. Mane, J. Buther, Zunjarrao Bhikaji Nagarkar v., Shri M. Venkatatesan, Shri M. Venkatesan, Shri M. Venkatesan, P-8, K.S. Gandhi, R.N. Banerjee, Martin Burn's, facie, Res, loquitur, Parshottam Udeshi, Anr, loquitur, Sarla Dixit, Anr, Balwant Yadav, Bench, B.S. Hullikatti, Rattan Singh, Order XIX, Bhikaji Nagarkar, Nagpur, Res, Paul P. Craig Q.C., Factual Error'

DATE: 1985, 18.5.1985, the same day, 4148, 1.12.1992, '10, one month, '13, '17, 1958)ILLJ247SC, 1952, LAC 490(F).'19, 2001, '25, '26, '28, '29, the year 1960-61, 1947, '30, 1944, 1995, '33, 2004 2, 1351, 2004

WORK_OF_ART: Tanjore and Nagapattinam

TIME: about 4 p.m., around 3.00 p.m.

QUANTITY: 3 inches

ORDINAL: second, first, first