Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Zaved Akhtar and Anr Vs. State of Jharkhand

Decided On : Oct-13-2015

Court : Jharkhand

LAW: Section 227, Section 227, Section 227, Section 227 Cr, Section 304-B of the, Section 304B of the I.P.C, Section 304-B of the, the Evidence Act, Section 106, the Evidence Act, Section 228, Section 227

CARDINAL: 965, 2, 963, 10/2015, 278, 802, 2, two, 9, 25.11.2009, 34, 3, four, 34

DATE: 2012 1, 2013, 10.09.2013, 2010, 2009, 2009, 2002, (1996, seven years, seven years, 2012, 2010, 1371, seven years

PERSON: Zaved Akhtar, Minhaz Ansari, Kamruddin Mian, P.S.-Muffasil, Petitioners Versus The State of, P.S.-Muffasil, Petitioners Versus The State of, AMITAV K. GUPTA, Hemant Kr, Mohit Prakash, Ravi Prakash, Amresh Kumar, No.963/2013, Muffasil, Zaved Akhtar, Delhi Adminstration, Chadha Vrs, 227 Cr, Amitav K. Gupta

ORG: Village-Sakhia, Village-Sakhia, Opposite Party, Additional Sessions, Dilawar Balu Kurane Vrs, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Hindustan, I.P.C, State, I.P.C, Asha Kumari & Anr, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, Reliance, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Magistrate, Ashish Chadha (Supra, Court, I.P.C

FAC: Sabiran Bibi, W/o Menhaz Ansari

GPE: Cr, Cr, S.T., P.S., G.R., Hindi

LOC: Sadar

NORP: Satish, Ashish

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //