Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Goa Plast (P) Ltd. Vs. Chico Ursula D'Souza
Decided On : Nov-20-2003
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 138, Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, Section 139 of the Act, Section 138 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 138 of the Act, Section 138, Section 138 and Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 138, the Amending Act, Section 139, Section 140, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 139 of the Act, Section 138, Section 142 of the Act, Section 138, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139, Section 138, Chapter XVII, Section 138, Section 138, Section 139 of the Act, Chapter XVII, Section 138 of the Act, Section 138, Section 139, Section 138, Section 138 of the Act, Section 138, Section 138, the Amending Act of, Section 138
PERSON: Ar, Lakshmanan, Panaji Bench, Shri Dhruv Mehta, Shri A.K. Sanghi, Shri Dhruv Mehta, Shri Dhruv Mehta, Rajan Kinnerkar, Rajan Kinnerkar, A.K. Sanghi, Shri A.K. Sanghi, Rajan Kinnerkar, Dishonour, P.W. Rege, Servant, Kuchil Kumar Nandi, Bench, Suppose, Hiten P. Dalal, Bratindranath Banerjee, K.N. Beena, Muniyappan, Anr, Ist, Ist, Chico Ursula D'Souza, Anr, Section 138, Kuchil Kumar Nandi, Surendra Madhavrao Nighojakar, Pharma, Anr, Demand Draft, Goa
NORP: J.1, P-1
ORG: the High Court of Judicature, High Court, the Judicial Magistrate, Bank, Bank, Judicial Magistrate, Criminal Appeal No, the High Court of Judicature, the High Court, Company, Bank, Court, Bank, Bank, Judicial Magistrate, the High Court, the High Court, Judicial Magistrate, Court, The High Court, Judicial Magistrate, the High Court, Magistrate, the High Court, Judicial Magistrate, Bank, Sections, Sections, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Judicial Magistrate, the High Court, Judicial Magistrate, Act.10, The High Court, Author Dr., under:'It, Legislature, the High Court, Mercantile, the High Court, under:'In, The High Court, the High Court, Appellant-Company, Bank, Bank, Bank, Judicial Magistrate, Bank, Bank, Bank, Magistrate, The High Court, Judicial Magistrate, the High Court, Judicial Magistrate, the High Court, Bank, Court, Modi Cements Ltd., under:'It, Electronics Trade & Technology Development Corpn., Electronics Trade and Technology Development Corpn, Court, Court, this Court in Electronics Trade & Development Corpn., this Court in Electronics Trade & Technology Development Corpn., Court, Bank, Vide Trilok Chand, Court, under:'In, The High Court, Magistrate, The High Court, Court, Goaplast, under:'In, Court, Modi Cements Ltd., Court, Electronic Trade & Technology Development Corporation, Indian Technologists & Engineers, Reliance, Court, M.M.T.C. Ltd., Anr, Medchi Chemicals, the High Court, the High Court, Judicial Magistrate, Court, Section 138 & 139 of the Act, Bank, Parliament, a Civil Court
GPE: Bombay, N.C., Bombay, Delhi, Modi, Modi
CARDINAL: 37/1995, 10, 40,000/-, 4, 12.02.1993, 40,000/-, 12.02.1993, 3, 25.08.1995, 12.01.1996, 12.02.1993, 12.02.1993, 4, 40,000/-, 138, 139, 139, 12.02.1993, 12.02.1993, 138, 139, 12, 18, 12.02.1993, 12.02.1993, 13 to 16, 1998CriLJ1397, three, 23, 26, 28, 142, 6, 38, 139, four, 139, 7, 2001CriLJ4745, 21.5.1993, 6, 2003CriLJ1723, 1998CriLJ1397, 2001CriLJ1674, 1996CriLJ1692, 23, 17, 2002CriLJ266, six
DATE: 25.08.1995, 15 days, the month of July, 1992, 06.03.1996, P-4., 1995, the month of April, 1993, one year, a period of, six months, fifteen days, fifteen days, 16, '11, '13, 19, '14, 20.07.1992, 10.01.1993, 02.06.1995, 8-8-1984, 9-8-1994, '22, '24, 17.11.2003, the year 1993, one year, one year, two years, 2002, one month's
ORDINAL: first, third, first, second, second, first
PRODUCT: P-3, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138