Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Goa Plast (P) Ltd. Vs. Chico Ursula D'Souza

Decided On : Nov-20-2003

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 138, Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, Section 139 of the Act, Section 138 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 138 of the Act, Section 138, Section 138 and Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 138, the Amending Act, Section 139, Section 140, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 139 of the Act, Section 138, Section 142 of the Act, Section 138, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139, Section 138, Chapter XVII, Section 138, Section 138, Section 139 of the Act, Chapter XVII, Section 138 of the Act, Section 138, Section 139, Section 138, Section 138 of the Act, Section 138, Section 138, the Amending Act of, Section 138

PERSON: Ar, Lakshmanan, Panaji Bench, Shri Dhruv Mehta, Shri A.K. Sanghi, Shri Dhruv Mehta, Shri Dhruv Mehta, Rajan Kinnerkar, Rajan Kinnerkar, A.K. Sanghi, Shri A.K. Sanghi, Rajan Kinnerkar, Dishonour, P.W. Rege, Servant, Kuchil Kumar Nandi, Bench, Suppose, Hiten P. Dalal, Bratindranath Banerjee, K.N. Beena, Muniyappan, Anr, Ist, Ist, Chico Ursula D'Souza, Anr, Section 138, Kuchil Kumar Nandi, Surendra Madhavrao Nighojakar, Pharma, Anr, Demand Draft, Goa

NORP: J.1, P-1

ORG: the High Court of Judicature, High Court, the Judicial Magistrate, Bank, Bank, Judicial Magistrate, Criminal Appeal No, the High Court of Judicature, the High Court, Company, Bank, Court, Bank, Bank, Judicial Magistrate, the High Court, the High Court, Judicial Magistrate, Court, The High Court, Judicial Magistrate, the High Court, Magistrate, the High Court, Judicial Magistrate, Bank, Sections, Sections, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Judicial Magistrate, the High Court, Judicial Magistrate, Act.10, The High Court, Author Dr., under:'It, Legislature, the High Court, Mercantile, the High Court, under:'In, The High Court, the High Court, Appellant-Company, Bank, Bank, Bank, Judicial Magistrate, Bank, Bank, Bank, Magistrate, The High Court, Judicial Magistrate, the High Court, Judicial Magistrate, the High Court, Bank, Court, Modi Cements Ltd., under:'It, Electronics Trade & Technology Development Corpn., Electronics Trade and Technology Development Corpn, Court, Court, this Court in Electronics Trade & Development Corpn., this Court in Electronics Trade & Technology Development Corpn., Court, Bank, Vide Trilok Chand, Court, under:'In, The High Court, Magistrate, The High Court, Court, Goaplast, under:'In, Court, Modi Cements Ltd., Court, Electronic Trade & Technology Development Corporation, Indian Technologists & Engineers, Reliance, Court, M.M.T.C. Ltd., Anr, Medchi Chemicals, the High Court, the High Court, Judicial Magistrate, Court, Section 138 & 139 of the Act, Bank, Parliament, a Civil Court

GPE: Bombay, N.C., Bombay, Delhi, Modi, Modi

CARDINAL: 37/1995, 10, 40,000/-, 4, 12.02.1993, 40,000/-, 12.02.1993, 3, 25.08.1995, 12.01.1996, 12.02.1993, 12.02.1993, 4, 40,000/-, 138, 139, 139, 12.02.1993, 12.02.1993, 138, 139, 12, 18, 12.02.1993, 12.02.1993, 13 to 16, 1998CriLJ1397, three, 23, 26, 28, 142, 6, 38, 139, four, 139, 7, 2001CriLJ4745, 21.5.1993, 6, 2003CriLJ1723, 1998CriLJ1397, 2001CriLJ1674, 1996CriLJ1692, 23, 17, 2002CriLJ266, six

DATE: 25.08.1995, 15 days, the month of July, 1992, 06.03.1996, P-4., 1995, the month of April, 1993, one year, a period of, six months, fifteen days, fifteen days, 16, '11, '13, 19, '14, 20.07.1992, 10.01.1993, 02.06.1995, 8-8-1984, 9-8-1994, '22, '24, 17.11.2003, the year 1993, one year, one year, two years, 2002, one month's

ORDINAL: first, third, first, second, second, first

PRODUCT: P-3, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //