Semantic Analysis by spaCy
M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Decided On : Apr-28-2000
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 15, Section 15, Article 32 of the Constitution of India, a Constitution Bench, Section 15, Section 15, Section 15
PERSON: B.N. Kirpal, S.S. Mohammed Quadri, M.C. Mehta v. Union of India1, D.R. Khanna, Retd, para 9)“Sl, M.C. Mehta, K.K. Venugopal, Birla Textiles v. Union, D.R. Khanna, G.L. Sanghi, M.C. Mehta v. Union, K.K. Venugopal, M.C. Mehta, M.C. Mehta v. Union
ORG: Court, Court, inter alia, Delhi Metropolitan Area, the National Capital Region, the National Capital Region Plan, the Government of India, Court, the Delhi Development Authority, DDA, DDA, the Land Allotment Committee, the Land Use Advisory Committee, DDA for development of green belts, Court, Floor Area Ratio, DDA, Notice, Court, Authority, Court, DDA, Writ Petition (Civil, Court, Court, the Delhi Development Authority Act, inter alia, Authority, Court, DDA, Court, Court, Court, DDA, DDA, Court, Writ Petition (C, Court, Court, the Delhi Development Authority, DDA, Court, Court, DDA, Additional Solicitor General, the Pollution Control Board/Committee
DATE: 10-5-1996, 1990, three years, 2 3 41, 2000, 10)“10, 1999, 10-5-1996, six months, 1990, three years, 1996, 1999, one month, 10-5-1996, 10-5-1996, four weeks, later than eight weeks, 10-5-1996, 4-12-1996, 10-5-1996, 4-12-1996
GPE: Masterplan, Delhi, Delhi, Masterplan, Masterplan, Masterplan, Masterplan, Masterplan, Delhi, Masterplan, Delhi, the District Judge, Delhi, Masterplan
CARDINAL: 361-62, Up to, 0.2 ha to 5, 57 433, 5, 10 ha, Over 10 ha 68 32”The, 362, 4, 2, 3, 4, one, 108, 8, 762, 15, 108, 329, 3)“3
ORDINAL: first, second
FAC: Serial Nos
PRODUCT: us.10
LOC: the District Judge