Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Hem Singh @ Hemu Vs. State of Haryana

Decided On : May-06-2009

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: a Division Bench, Section 302, the Indian Penal Code, Section 25, the Arms Act, Section 302, Arms Act, Section 34, Section 25, the Arms Act, Section 34, Section 25, Section 34, the Arms Act, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 9, the Evidence Act, Section 9, the Evidence Act, Section 302/49, Section 149 IPC, Section 149 IPC, Section 149

ORG: S.B. Sinha, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal Nos, Hemu, U.P., Constable Ramesh Kumar, Constable Lasker Singh, P.W.10, Sections 25, P.W.10, Village Dagarpur, Hemu, IPC, P.S Sarita Vihar, Hemu, Hemu, Hemu, Hemu, Lilu, Constable Lasker Singh, Additional Sessions, Constable Lasker Singh, Hemu, IPC, IPC, IPC, Criminal Appeals, the High Court, inter alia, Hemu, Hemu, IPC, us.6, FIR, Hemu, FIR, Copies of FIR, CIA, C. Shiv, Jeep, Sd/-, Hemu, Hemu, Hemu, a Delhi Court, the High Court, Kuldeep Singh (P.W., Hemu, Hemu, Lilu, Lilu, Vinod, Naseem, State, Court, Court, U.P., Court, Court, Court, Hemu, Bollavaram Pedda Narsi Reddy and Ors, State of Andhra Pradesh, Court, Nathuni Yadav v. State of Bihar, Counsel for the State, Court, State, U.P., the High Court

NORP: J.1, Satender, Postmortem, Yunis, Liyaquat

CARDINAL: two, 392, 307, 353, 34, 24/25.12.1999, one, 775, 25.12.1999, 307, 353, 59, about 5.1.2000, 6.1.2000, 11.1.2000, about 19.1.2000, 23.1.2000, 25.12.1999.Indisputably, 6.1.2000, 17, 185, 353, about 6.1.2000, 2.2.2000, 101, 302, 307, 307, 353, five, five, one, three, 6, three, 2, 25.12.99(in, 6.1.2000, 22.1.2000, three, two, 8, 10, five, two, 2008CriLJ3036, 1971CriLJ913, 1973CriLJ1176, 2007CriLJ1168, 2, 3, 1991CriLJ1833, two, 13, 14, 2002CriLJ4322, 2006CriLJ4033 .{See, 2, only five to, 2003CriLJ817

DATE: 1.8.2006, 2005, 2005, 45, the same day, 25.12.1999, 2001, 1825, 1441, 1824, 1872, 2009

PERSON: IPC, Kuldeep Singh, Lakarpur, Kuldeep Singh, Constables Ramesh Kumar, Lasker Singh, Lasker Singh, Palvinder Singh, Yamha Motorcycle, Pappu @ Lilu, Hem Singh, Hem Singh, Hem Singh, Hem Singh, Ram Kishan No, C. Suraj Mal 2106, C. Sunder, Accused Hemu, Hem Singh, Rajeev Gaur, Mahabir, Santokh Singh, Izhar Hussain, Amitsingh Bhikamsing Thakur v. State, S. Sudershan Reddy v. State, Sheo Lal, Naseem, Alias Kariya, Lasker Singh, Laskar Singh

TIME: the night, about 1.30 a.m., a dark night, a dark night, the hours, close to midnight

GPE: Sattey, Sunil, Vinod, Singh, Sattey, P.S., Vinod, Delhi, New Delhi, New Delhi, Sattey, Vinod, Sunil, Vinod, Faridabad, Vinod, Sattey, Sattey, Hemu, Vinod, Delhi, Delhi, Vinod, Sunil, Vinod, Hemu, Sunil, Sattey, Sunil, Vinod, Sattey, Sattey, Vinod, Sattey, court.10, The State of Delhi, Matru, Sattey, Bharosi, Sattey, Sattey

PRODUCT: P.W. 2, .315, a Maruti Car

MONEY: 27 Arms Act

QUANTITY: 4.40 A.M.

FAC: Accused Sattey

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first

EVENT: the 'Evidence Act'

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //