Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Hem Singh @ Hemu Vs. State of Haryana
Decided On : May-06-2009
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: a Division Bench, Section 302, the Indian Penal Code, Section 25, the Arms Act, Section 302, Arms Act, Section 34, Section 25, the Arms Act, Section 34, Section 25, Section 34, the Arms Act, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 9, the Evidence Act, Section 9, the Evidence Act, Section 302/49, Section 149 IPC, Section 149 IPC, Section 149
ORG: S.B. Sinha, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal Nos, Hemu, U.P., Constable Ramesh Kumar, Constable Lasker Singh, P.W.10, Sections 25, P.W.10, Village Dagarpur, Hemu, IPC, P.S Sarita Vihar, Hemu, Hemu, Hemu, Hemu, Lilu, Constable Lasker Singh, Additional Sessions, Constable Lasker Singh, Hemu, IPC, IPC, IPC, Criminal Appeals, the High Court, inter alia, Hemu, Hemu, IPC, us.6, FIR, Hemu, FIR, Copies of FIR, CIA, C. Shiv, Jeep, Sd/-, Hemu, Hemu, Hemu, a Delhi Court, the High Court, Kuldeep Singh (P.W., Hemu, Hemu, Lilu, Lilu, Vinod, Naseem, State, Court, Court, U.P., Court, Court, Court, Hemu, Bollavaram Pedda Narsi Reddy and Ors, State of Andhra Pradesh, Court, Nathuni Yadav v. State of Bihar, Counsel for the State, Court, State, U.P., the High Court
NORP: J.1, Satender, Postmortem, Yunis, Liyaquat
CARDINAL: two, 392, 307, 353, 34, 24/25.12.1999, one, 775, 25.12.1999, 307, 353, 59, about 5.1.2000, 6.1.2000, 11.1.2000, about 19.1.2000, 23.1.2000, 25.12.1999.Indisputably, 6.1.2000, 17, 185, 353, about 6.1.2000, 2.2.2000, 101, 302, 307, 307, 353, five, five, one, three, 6, three, 2, 25.12.99(in, 6.1.2000, 22.1.2000, three, two, 8, 10, five, two, 2008CriLJ3036, 1971CriLJ913, 1973CriLJ1176, 2007CriLJ1168, 2, 3, 1991CriLJ1833, two, 13, 14, 2002CriLJ4322, 2006CriLJ4033 .{See, 2, only five to, 2003CriLJ817
DATE: 1.8.2006, 2005, 2005, 45, the same day, 25.12.1999, 2001, 1825, 1441, 1824, 1872, 2009
PERSON: IPC, Kuldeep Singh, Lakarpur, Kuldeep Singh, Constables Ramesh Kumar, Lasker Singh, Lasker Singh, Palvinder Singh, Yamha Motorcycle, Pappu @ Lilu, Hem Singh, Hem Singh, Hem Singh, Hem Singh, Ram Kishan No, C. Suraj Mal 2106, C. Sunder, Accused Hemu, Hem Singh, Rajeev Gaur, Mahabir, Santokh Singh, Izhar Hussain, Amitsingh Bhikamsing Thakur v. State, S. Sudershan Reddy v. State, Sheo Lal, Naseem, Alias Kariya, Lasker Singh, Laskar Singh
TIME: the night, about 1.30 a.m., a dark night, a dark night, the hours, close to midnight
GPE: Sattey, Sunil, Vinod, Singh, Sattey, P.S., Vinod, Delhi, New Delhi, New Delhi, Sattey, Vinod, Sunil, Vinod, Faridabad, Vinod, Sattey, Sattey, Hemu, Vinod, Delhi, Delhi, Vinod, Sunil, Vinod, Hemu, Sunil, Sattey, Sunil, Vinod, Sattey, Sattey, Vinod, Sattey, court.10, The State of Delhi, Matru, Sattey, Bharosi, Sattey, Sattey
PRODUCT: P.W. 2, .315, a Maruti Car
MONEY: 27 Arms Act
QUANTITY: 4.40 A.M.
FAC: Accused Sattey
ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first
EVENT: the 'Evidence Act'