Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Regu Mahesh @ Regu Maheswar Rao Vs. Rajendra Pratap Bhanj Dev and anr.

Decided On : Oct-30-2003

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, Sections 5, Order VI Rule, Order VII Rule 11, Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 86, Sections 5, Rule 94-A of the Conduct of Election Rules, Section 86(1, Section 81 or Section 82 or Section 117 of the Act, Section 83(1, Section 123(3, Section 100 and Section 101, Section 83 Contents, Section 81 or Section 82 or Section 117, Section 98.(2, Section 80A.(3, Section 97, Section 123, Section 83(b, Section 123(3, Section 83(c, Rule 15, Rule 94-A of the Rules, the R.P. Act, Order 6 Rule 13, Order 19 Rule 3 of the Code, Order 19, Rule 3 of the Code 'Whether the Code, The Constitution Bench, Order 19, Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code

NORP: J.1, not.(2

DATE: 1951, 27.12.2002, 11.9.1999, 1908, 1961, forty-five days, 1908, fourteen days, from day, the following day, six months

ORG: the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly, the High Court, CPC, the High Court, Order VI Rule, CPC, the High Court, The Election Petition, the Election Petition, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, CPC, F.A. Sapa and Ors, Court, CPC, Court, F.A. Sapa's, Court, Court, Court, R.P. Moidutty's, the High Court, Court, Court, State, Court, the Calcutta High Court, Barium Chemicals Ltd., Anr., Company Law Board, Court, Court, Nambiar v. Union of India, Court, State, Dhar 37 Cal, the High Court

CARDINAL: 1, 10, 1, 1, 100(1)(c, 19.11.1999, 1, 1, 16, 15, 100(1)(d)(i, 25, 1, 5., 1, 8, one, 1, more than one, two, 1, 5, 1, one, 2, one, 5, one, 15, 1, one, 2, 3, 2, 10, 1991]2SCR752a, three, 28, 11, 1999]1SCR198, three, 2001]1SCR95, 12, 13, 14, 1 to 17, 1964]3SCR573, 15, One, 1967]1SCR898, 1970]3SCR121, 16, 259, 18, two, 19

LOC: Saluru

PERSON: Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Tribe, follows:(a, Schedule Tribe, x(3, Singora, Bench, H.D. Revanna v. G. Puttaswamy Gowda, Bench, Vijay Laxmi, R.P. Moidutty v., Mohammad, Anr, Singora, Shyam Ram, Kumar v., Roop Singh, A.S. Subbarai, Kumar Saklecha v., Jagjiwan, Jog Naik, Padmadbati Dasi v. Rasik Lal Dhar, Anr, Woodroffe, Rasik Lal

PRODUCT: Order VI Rule

FAC: Sections 83 and 86, Jenkins C.J.

GPE: Virendra, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Padmabati

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //