Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ram Chandra Singh Vs. Savitri Devi and ors.

Decided On : Oct-09-2003

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Hindu Succession Act, the Hindu Succession Act, the Theft Act, Section 151 CPC, Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure

ORG: S.B. Sinha, Civil Review, the High Court of Judicature, State Bank of India, Bank, Bank, Annas, Vth Additional Sub, Execution Application, Bank, the Executing Court, Revision Petition Application, the High Court, Revision Petition No, High Court, Special Leave Petition, Court, Special Leave Petition, Title Suit, Partition Suit, the Hindu Succession, Smt, Plaintiff, Civil Revision, the High Court, S.L.P., Civil Review, the High Court, Civil Review, inter alia, Bank, the High Court, the Special Leave Petition, Court, Court, Fraud, Fraud, AC 337, Fraud, Fraudulent Conveyances, Court, 3rd September,, U.P. Board, AC, Lazarus Estate, the Court of Appeal, Court, Court, Court, Naidu, Court, Arlidge & Parry on Fraud, Shaw Brothers, Court, The Courts of law, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Indian Bank, Satyam Fibres, Court, Lazarus Estates, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Durgapore Project Limited, The High Court, Sharda, Court, Court, Court, Court, The High Court, Civil Review, Court, the Review Application, First Appeal, the High Court, The High Court, The High Court, Dwarka Prasad Agarwal, B.D. Agarwal, the High Court, The High Court, Dwarka Prasad Agarwal, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, law.41, the State Government, The High Court, Bank, Court, The High Court, Ors, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Tarapada Dey, the High Court

NORP: J.1, Arun Prakash Pandey, noticed:'The

DATE: 10.12.1998, 1520 of 1997, 1998, 88/9/1977-80, 27.8.1988, the year 1990, 25.6.1992, 1700, 19.7.78, the year 1944, 1956, the year 1944, 1956, 1999, 1998, 22.5.1988, 1981, 20273 0f 2000, the year 1944, 1956, 22nd May, 1988, 1981, 21.5.1992, 1889, '21, '22, '23, 2003, 1889, 1956, '26, '29, '31, '34, 10.12.1998, 245/1998, '40

GPE: CR, p.a., the Takhta of Arun Prakash Pandey, CR, Fraud, Jessel, M.R., Fraud, S.P., Jones, S.P., India, New Delhi, Singh, New Delhi

CARDINAL: 10.5.1999, 245, 2, 1,15,312.62, 6, 19.7.1979, 1, 10, about 22.6.1981, 4.8.1982, 4, 22.5.1988, two, about 7.6.1988, 1,61,593.53, 7.7.1988, 11/68, 27.8.1988, about 11.12.1990, 2.1.5.1992, 2, 17/1976, 1990.8, 17/76, 9, 6535, 245, 450, 22.6.1981, two, 10.5.1999, 27.8.1988, 22.6.1981, 450, two, 14, 23, 1, 14, 1, 24, 21:'Indeed, 1996)IIILLJ188Cal, 32, 2003]3SCR106, three, 35, 10.5.1999, 3.9.1992, 2003)7SCC219, 1988]1SCR118, 1996]1SCR1154, 2000]2SCR871

PERSON: Arun Prakash Pandey, Misc, Savitri Devi, Arun Prakash Pandey, Initiated, order.10, S.L.P., G.C. Bharuka, Ram Lal Roy, Roy, Derry, Peek, Kerr, Slim v. Croucher, Derry v. Peek, Herschell, Ram Preeti Yadav, Derry v. Peek, Jones, Dhawan, Chittaranjan Das, Order XXVI, Order XX, thereto.33, Manohar Lal Chopra v. Raj Bahadur Rao Raja Seth Hiralal, Dharmpal, Bench, suo motu, Anr, curiae neminem gravabit'.44, Rajesh D. Darbar, Narasingrao Krishnaji Kulkarni, curiae neminem, Kumar Dey, Mohammed Gazi v. State

QUANTITY: 95.20 acres, 30 acres, 57.12 acres, 95.20 acres, 60 acres, only 30 acres

PERCENT: 6%

WORK_OF_ART: Ugam Pandey, terms:'The Code of Civil Procedure

ORDINAL: First, First, First, third, third, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //