Lic of India and anr. Vs. Consumer Education and Research Center and ors.

Decided On : May-10-1995

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Table 58, Table 58, Table 58, Article 21 of the Constitution, Table 58, Table 58', Table 58 under Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution, Table 58, Table 58, Table 58, Article 25 of the Declaration of Human Rights, Article 7 of the International Covenant on Economic and Social Rights, Constitution, Article 21, Table 58, Constitution, Constitution, Table 58, Table 58, Table 58, Constitution, Article 14, Article 19, Article 21, Article 38, Article 39, Article 41, Article 47, Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 7 of the International Covenant on Economic and Social Rights, A Constitution Bench, Constitution, another Constitution Bench, Article 38, Article 21, Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 7(b, Article 19(e, Article 25(2, the Universal Declaration of the Human Right and Article 7 of the International Convention of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Article 21, Constitution, Constitution, Table 58, Section 2(11, the Insurance Act, Constitution, Article 14.22, the Constitution Bench, another Constitution Bench, another Constitution Bench, another Constitution Bench, The Administrative Law by Wade, Chapter 16, Chapter 17, the Rent Act, Article 226, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14.26, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 226, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14, Article 226 the Court, Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, Table 58, Table 58, Table 58, Table 58, The Civil Code of Germany, Section 138(2, Constitution, Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14, Constitution, Regulation 9, Article 298, Constitution, Constitution, Section 25-N of the Industrial ' Disputes Act, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, the Constitution the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 14, Constitution, Table 58

ORG: K. Ramaswamy, Gujarat High Court, LIC, LIC, The High Court, Government or Quasi-Government, Corporation, Life Insurance, Judicial, Life Insurance, The High Court, Corporation, High Court, the High Court, Court, LIC, Sezhivan Committee, LIC, the High Court, LIC, Sezhivan Committee Report, LIC, LIC, LIC, LIC, Committee, LIC, Committee, Committee of Actuaries, Consumer Education & Research, K. Ramaswamy, J. SC, Corporation, the Armed Forces, the Divisional Office of the Corporation, Table, Sezhivan Committee, Table, State, State, State, Court, D.S. Nakara v. Union of India, Preamble, Bombay Municipal Corporation, Supp(2, Court, ESI Corporation, Supp, International Convention of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Court, C.E.S.C. Ltd., Consumer Education & Research, v. Union of India JT, SC, the Preamble Chapter of Fundamental Rights and, Erusian Equipment & Chemicals Ltd., Court, State, State, State, U.P., State, State, International Airport Authority of India, State, J & K, State, Court, Court, State, Application for Judicial Review', Court, Court, LIC v. Escorts Ltd., Supp, State, Court, Court, Court, State, State, State, Dwarkadas Marfatia & Sons v. Board of Trustees, Corporation, Court, Court, Mahabir Auto Stores, India Oil Corporation, State, State, State, Court, Stain, State, U.P., Court, State, State, State, Food Corporation of India, Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries, Court, Sterling Computers Ltd., M & N Publications Ltd., The High Court, Union of India, Graphic Industries Co., Court, General Assurance Society Ltd., the High Court, State, Sezhivan Committee, Gillespie Brothers & Co. Ltd., Roy Bowles Transport Ltd., sec, Lloyds Bank Ltd, A. Schroeder Music Publishing Co., House of Lords, Steam Carpet Co. Ltd., Q.B. 69, M.R., Photo Production Ltd, Securicor Transport Ltd., A.C. 827, Wilberforce, Wilberforce, Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd., Brojo Nath Ganguly, State, State, Mazdoor Congress, J., Chitti on Contract, 25th Edn., State, Harvard University, Leff's, the Development of New Doctrine', Law Review, Quoting Section 208 of the Restatement, M.P. Ellinghaus, Yale Law Journal, Stale of A.P., the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Clauses 11, the A.P. Standard Specifications, National Textiles Workers' Union, Meenakshi Mills Ltd, Meenakshi Mills Ltd., Consumer Education & Research, v. Union of India JT, SC, the Preamble of the Constitution, European Convention of Social Economic and Cultural, the Convention on Right, Breach, Andi Mukta Trust, Karnataka S.L.P., the High Court, Court, Court, Comptroller & Auditor General, Court, Preamble, the High Court

NORP: J.1, egalitarian, Indian, Mandamus, egalitarian, Unni, Unni, Indian

DATE: January 31, 1994, 1980, August 25, 1980, December, 1978, September, 1980 Respondent Nos, September 14, 1980, the preceding year, 19, the expiry of, two years, two years, 45 to 50 years, the year 1980, para 13.1(i, 58, 45 years, 6 and 7 years, 45 years, 50 years, five years, 46 to 50 years, 20 YEARS, 5 YEARS 6 YEARS 7 YEARS 58 Rs, the age of 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 years, Age nearer 5 years 6 years 7 years, 35, 8.70, 5 to 7 years, the year 1985 to 1989, 70, the last two years, 5 years 6 years 7 years 15, 4.90 35, 1985, 43, 1993, 38, February 22, 1995, 32, 1995, 1938, 1979)IILLJ217SC, 1977, 1985, 21, 5 to 7 years, 50 years, 1973, many years ago, 1973, 1974, 1308, 1978, 1980, 1977, the day, nineteenth-century, today, one month's, 22, today, 1191, '34, 1193, the last decade, 1215, 1249, 1982, 1967, the last fifteen years, the past thirty years, 1968-1969, '47, 1988, 29, 59, 1983)ILLJ45SC, 1992)IILLJ294SC, 1984, 39A, 41, 43, 1995, 1965]57ITR349(SC, 11012/1991, April 17, 1995, 1969)IILLJ479SC, 1989)IILLJ324SC

GPE: Spl, Government, India, U.K, India, the United States of America, Government, India, India, Murlidhar, Govt., Clauses, Kasturi, Kumari, D.T.C., K.R.S., Brojonath, USA, Workmen, Asbestos, Krishnan v. State, Anadi Mukta, India, Government

CARDINAL: 2614, one, 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 2, 5, 21, one, 1 3.18, one, 375, 5, three, 4.80, 4.65, 14, 217.15, 179.40, 152.65, 11, 188.90, 126.00, 10, 20, 25, 30, 6.50 6.55, 6.65 40, 9.10, 50, 11, 10.80 10.75, 20, 11.65, 4.80, 4.70 4.65 25, 13.05, 4.95, 18.25, 6.50 6.55, 6, 7, 35, 50,000, 912.5, 325, 327.5 332.5, 1983)ILLJ104SC, one, one, 51, 39(e, 41, 48, 4, 100, 105, 21, 952/77, one, 1992)ILLJ475SC, 1, three, 21, 20, 21, 1975]2SCR674, 1955]1SCR707, 1970]3SCR505, 1980]3SCR1338, 1987]1SCR819, 168, 23, two, 514, 573, 3, 909, 1989]2SCR751, 1990]1SCR818, 22, 1966]3SCR500, 1, 3, 1, 1, two, 1986)IILLJ171SC, two, one, 95, two, 441, 115, 485, 494, 752, one, 799, 78, 766, 768, 774, 814, 1, 461, 62(b, 73, 1, 1989)IILLJ324SC, 1993]1SCR594, 1975)IILLJ418SC, 1993]1SCR594, 1986]2SCR17, 4, 58

PERSON: Manubhai Shah, D.N. Dalai, Articles 14, Sri Harish Salve, Articles 14, Shri Dhawan, LIC, the Term Policy, Olga Tellis v., Francis De Costa, Articles 39(e, Kesekar, Vishwanath Pandu, Chandra Bose, Socio, Articles 14, Saghir Ahmad v. State, A. Sanjeevi Naidu, Ramana Dayaram Shetty, Lal Lakshmi Reddy v. State, M.C. Mehta v. Union, Cardozo, 5th Ed, Administrative Law, Certiorari, Chandumull Jain, Gandhi, Denning M.R., Deplock, Levison, Anr, Deplock, Scarman, Madan, Vol.1, Anson, Todd D. Rakoff, Slawson, 95 Har, L.R., M.A. Eisenberg, Arthur Leff, Leff, Contracts, Eisenberg, Law Lecturer, V. Raghunadha Rao v., Andhra Law Times, Articles 14, P.R. Ramakrishnan, Articles 38, Dwarkanath v. Income Tax Officer, Kanpur, V.R. Rudani, Gammon v. State, M.J. Sivani, Praga Tools Corpn, C.A. Imanual, V.R. Rudani, K.S. Jagannathan, Interference

PRODUCT: Table Mi, Tables, 4.95 4.90, Articles 14, Table 58, Table 58, Table 58, 757, 767, Para 3(2, Articles 14

ORDINAL: 1st, first, first, first, first, second, Second

EVENT: Table 58, Table 58, Table 58, Table 58

PERCENT: only about 10%, 10%

WORK_OF_ART: the Directive Principles of the State, Judicial Process', the Preamble of the Constitution, Contracts of Adhesion, 'The Bargain Principle And Its Limits', 'Unconscionability of the Code'

LOC: Madras

QUANTITY: under 5 foot

MONEY: 21 Restatement