Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Decided On : Nov-30-2000

Court : Supreme Court of India

PERSON: Umesh C. Banerjee, Advance License, Bill, Andhiyarujina, JPC levies.(7, Andhyarujina, Andhyarujina, Parker, Andhyarujina, Andhyarujina, SAIL, Andhiyarujina, Chunder Dey, Gopal Chunder, Laha 1898, Dixon, J., Grund, Spencer Bower, Dixon, J., Grundts, Phipson, Lyon, Freeman v. Cooke, Square v. Square

NORP: J.1, contra, English, English, Indian, Indian

ORG: the High Court, Calcutta, International Price Reimbursement Scheme, IPRS, the Government of India, the Department of Iron & Steel, the Ministry of Steel, Heavy Engineering, the Government of India, the Joint Plant Committee, JPC, Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., Indian Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., Hindustan Steel Ltd., Presently Steel Authority of India, Government of India Notification, JPC, Freight Differential Fund, JPC Engineering Goods Export Assistance Fund, Bar, Rods, Blooms, Coil, JPC, JPC, the Government of India, the International Price Reimbursement Scheme, the Government of India, Ministry of Commerce Notification, Scheme, Clauses 2.4, Iron & Steel Controller, Regional Office, EEPC, JPC, JPC, EEPC, Main Producers, Accountant's Certificate, Customs, Scheme, Scheme, VI, the Disbursing Authority, Government, Scheme, JPC, the Engineering Export Promotion Council, Scheme, Council, Council, JPC, JPC, Scheme, the EEP Council, Council, Council, IPR - Scheme, the High Court, Letters Patent Appeal, the Appellate Bench, the High Court, Court, Scheme, JPC, JPC, JPC, JPC, Scheme, JPC, Scheme, JPC, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Mukand Iron, Jindal, Orient, Scheme, Scheme, the Union of India, JPC, JPC, JPC, IPRS, JPC, Respondents:12, JPC, Steel Development Fund, Freight Equalisation Fund, FEF, JPC, IPRS, the International Price Reimbursement Scheme, IPRS, Engineering, International, JPC, the Additional-Solicitor General, Tata Iron, JPC, Union of India, Government, IPRS, JPC, JPC, the Union of India, Scheme, the IPRS Scheme, IPRS, the English Courts, Sears, the Privy Council, Sarat, Seton Laing Co., the High Court of Australia, Craine v. Colonial Mutual Fire Insurance Co. Ltd., C.L.R., Gold Mines Ltd., C.L.R., Turner, Central Newbury Car Auctions Ltd., Unity Finance Ltd., ER, un, Sears, Mercantile Bank, Central Bank 1938, AC 287, National Westminster Bank, Barclays Bank International 1975, the House of Lords, Moorgate Mercantile Co. Ltd., Twitchings, AC 890, effect:-We, CCI & C., Iron & Steel, JPC, JPC, the Judgment of the Calcutta High Court

CARDINAL: two, 81, 9.2.1981, One, 2.5, 2.7, 2.8, one, two, seven, 8, 202, four, 469, three, one, 305, 59, 3, 21, 13, one, 469, 2, 654, two, 2, four

ORDINAL: first, second, Second, Firstly, Secondly

DATE: 17th March, 1972, March 20, 1972, 23rd July, 1981, 45 days, the second preceding month, a particular month, a period of, 10 days, 7) days, November, 1992, 19th January, 1993, all these years, 19th May, 1994, 1985, 1985, 17th of October, 1985, 1963, 17th October, 1985, 17th October, 1985, 1985, 1992, 1992, 1837 6, 1887 19, 1920 28, 1938, 1956, 1844, 1837, 1848, 1977, 1935, 12022, 10 days, 30th November, 1990, March 8, 1991

PERCENT: 18%

WORK_OF_ART: the Writ Petition, the Amendment, L.R. 19 IndAp 203, The Great Boulder Pty

LOC: the Appellant, Single

EVENT: Clause 28

GPE: IPRS, IPRS, India, India, IPRS, Pickard, Shand, Pickard

LANGUAGE: English

PRODUCT: 905