Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Jagdish Chandra Nijhawan Vs. S.K. Saraf

Decided On : Nov-27-1998

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 630, the Companies Act, the Indian Penal Code, Section 630, the Companies Act

GPE: ORDERNanavati, Crl

NORP: J.1

ORG: the High Court of Calcutta allowing Criminal Revision No, the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Magistrate, Andrew Yule & Co. Ltd., ABC Products Ltd., ABC, ABC Consultants, P) Ltd., ABC, ABC, ABC Consultants, ABC Consultants, ABC, ABC, ABC, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, ABC, the Company Law Board, Company, ABC, ABC, Magistrate, ABC, The High Court, Magistrate, IPC, the High Court, Company, IPC, Magistrate, the High Court, Magistrate, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, ABC, Triveli Court', ABC Consultants, xxxxx xxxxxx7.2 Regarding the Flat, ABC, ABC, the Company Law Board, ABC, ABC, ABC, ABC, ABC, ABC, ABC, ABC Consultants, ABC Consultants, P) Ltd., ABC, the High Court, the High Court, Criminal Revision, the Court of Judicial Magistrate

CARDINAL: 624, 29.4.1983, 5.2.1985, 406, 408, 409, 6.1.1986, 408, 406, 408, 29.4.1983, 7.2, 7.2.1, 7.2.4, 6.1.1, 7.2.1, 6, 1.10.84, 624

DATE: 1986, 29.4.1983, 29th April, 1983, 16.5.1983, 1.11.1983, 5 years, 21.1.1985, 5 years, 11 months, 11.3.1985, 12.7.1985, earlier than 30 months, 30 days, 30 months, 12.11.1984, 1986

PERSON: Alipur, Schedule, Saraf, R.F. Nariman, Paragraphs 6.1, Alipur

WORK_OF_ART: Criminal Case No

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //