Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Bses Ltd. (Now Reliance Energy Ltd.) Vs. Fenner India Ltd. and anr.
Decided On : Feb-03-2006
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: the First Respondent', the First Respondent, Section 9, the Arbitration Act', Section 17, the Arbitration Act
PERSON: B.N. Srikrishna, Nos, Madras, Rohtagi, Sujata V. Manohar, J.11, Sorabjee, Sorabjee, Elian, Rabbath, Elian, Rabbath, Thornton QC, Sorabjee, Sorabjee, JA, Sorabjee, Sorabjee, Sorabjee, Sorabjee, Sorabjee, Sorabjee, Rohtagi, Contractor, Sorabjee, Sorabjee, Sorabjee, Sorabjee, Sorabjee, Sorabjee, Punj Sons
NORP: J.1, K. Jagannatha Shetty, K. Jagannatha Shetty
CARDINAL: one, four, 15.3.2000/ 4.5.2000, 2246, 15.3.2000/ 4.5.2000, 15.3.2000/ 4.5.2000, 15.3.2000/ 4.5.2000, four, 23.3.2000, 291/99, 55,70,000/-, 38,35,000, 10.5.2000, 4, four, four, 22.3.2004, 10, two, 1996]1SCR293, 1981]3SCR300, 2002)10SCC508, 12, 914, 2, 13, 2002, 1, 16, two, 17, 291/99, 23.3.2000, 10.5.2000, four, four, 1, 10.5.2000.The, 2):The, 3, four, four, 4, 5, 19, four, four, 10.5.2000, four, three, 291/99, 23.3.2000, three, 11, 23.3.2000, 1991]3SCR412, two, only one, 25, one, one, four, four, 27
ORG: Godavari Sugars Ltd., M/s BSES Ltd., Reliance Energy Ltd., M/s Fenner India Ltd., Appellant, the First Respondent, the State Bank of India, the First Respondent, the First Respondent, Bank Guarantees, the District Court, Madurai, The First Respondent, Madurai, District Judge, the Arbitral Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the First Respondent, Court, U.P. Cooperative Federation Ltd., Singh Consultants and Engineers, U.P. Cooperative Federation', U.P. State Sugar Corporation, Sumac International Ltd., State, Maharashtra v. National Construction Co., United Commercial Bank, Bank of India, Vinmar Impex Inc., U.P. State Sugar Corporation, Sumac International Ltd., U.P. State Sugar Corporation', Court, Court, State, Haryana v. Continental Construction Ltd., Continental Construction Ltd.', Continental Construction Ltd., Court, Bench Division, TTI Team Telecom Ltd., Hutchison 3G UK Ltd., EWHC 762, the Court of Appeal in Samwoh Asphalt Premix Pte. Ltd., Sum Cheong Piling Pte, LP Thean, U.P. Cooperative Federation, Court, Appellant, Learned Counsel, the High Court, the District Court, the High Court, the First Respondent, the First Respondent, The High Court, U.P. Cooperative Federation Ltd., the District Court, the High Court, the First Respondent, CONTRACTOR, III, BSES, Owner, Store Issue Voucher, Vide Clause, CONTRACTOR, CONTRACTOR, BSES, Clauses, Bank Guarantees, Contractor, Appellant, the First Respondent, the First Respondent, Court, the First Respondent, the Additional Affidavit, the First Respondents, The Fourth Bank Guarantee21, No.291/99, M/s Godavari Sugar Mills Ltd., Fenner, Court, Court, General Electric Technical Services Company Inc., Bank, J. See, U.P. Cooperative Federation Ltd., Singh Consultants and Engineers, Court, Bank, Bank, the First Respondent, the Arbitral Tribunal, the First Respondent, Arbitrators, the First Respondent, the High Court, Madurai, Rupees Twenty Thousand
DATE: 2245, 2247, 2248, 290/99, 4.12.2003, 7.12.2003, 8.12.2003, 1996, 22.3.2004, one month, April 2004, 24.5.2004, 30.7.2004, 2003, 2003, 1966, 11.11.2005, 18.3.2003
TIME: 288/99, 289/99, 1988]1SCR1124
PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Contracts, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Contracts, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant
FAC: Principal District, the Additional Affidavit
ORDINAL: first, second, first, Second, third, third, fourth, first, fourth, first, first, first, fourth, first
GPE: Bombay, Matsas, Mastsas, England, Singapore, Singapore, India
WORK_OF_ART: 1 All ER, propositions:(3, Appellant
EVENT: Contract-II