Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Harish Verma and ors. Vs. Ajay Srivastava and anr.

Decided On : Sep-16-2003

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 33, Section 20, Section 18, Article 15(4, the Constitution of India?2, Article 14 of the Constitution of India?9, Article 136 of the Constitution, Section 20(1, the Full Bench, the Constitution Bench, the Full Bench of, Constitution Bench

PERSON: R.C. Lahoti, nisi, Indu Malhotra, Salman Khursheed, Ranji Thomas, Maninder Singh, Indu Malhtora, Preeti Srivastava, Anr, Preeti Srivastava's, Gopal D. Tirthani, Preeti Srivastava's, Kumar Singh, Preeti Srivastava's, Gopal D. Tirthani, Preeti Shrivastava, merit inter se, Preeti Srivastava, Anr, Rajasthan

NORP: J.1

ORG: SLP, the Indian Medical Council Act, the Medical Council of India, the Central Government, under:-9, the State Government, the Competent authority, the State Government, State, Individual, MBBS, the University of Rajasthan, SC/ST, the State of Rajasthan, the High Court, State, The High Court, The State of Rajasthan, the University of Rajasthan, the Medical Council of India, the Medical Council of India, the High Court, the High Court, Its Judgment the Full Bench, the Medical Council of India, the State Government, State, the State Government, the Medical Council of India.11, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Medical and Health Department, the Notice Board, the High Court, the Medical Council of India, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Bench, Court, Court, The State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors, Sujata Manohar, the Indian Medical Council Act, Council, the Medical Council of India Act, Court, Ajay, Ors, the Medical Council of India, The Medical Council Regulations, the Medical Council of India, The Medical Council, Common Entrance Examination, the Medical Council of India, the Medical Council of India, the High Court, Vide, Regulation, the Medical Council of India, State, State, State, the High Court, Rajasthan High Court, The State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors, the Medical Council of India, Court, Intelligence, the Medical Council of India's Regulation, the State Government, State, the Medical Council of India, State, Central Government, the Medical Council of India, the Medical Council of India, State, Court, the Medical Council of India, Court, the Medical Council of India.20, the High Court, Court, Court, Gopal D. Tirthani & Ors, the High Court, the Medical Council of India, the Medical Council of India

CARDINAL: 4965/03, 2, 44, two, 24.2.2003, 126, 75, between 40 and 50, one, 80, only 18, 62, 28/29.8.2003.12, four, 16 to 20, 1994]3SCR57, 55);(ii, 57);(iii, 77, 116, 116, one, one, only one

DATE: 14367, 1956, or(iii, 20.9.2001, the first week of March 2002, 21.4.2002, 21.4,2002, 29.4.2002, 2nd March, 2002, 28.8.2002, 5.2.2003, 4.4.2003, the year 2003, 2003, 19.8.2003, 1956, '18, '19, 2002, 2003, the year 2002, 2003

ORDINAL: first, second, third, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first

PERCENT: 50 percent, 40 percent, fifty percent, the remaining fifty percent

PRODUCT: Regulation 9, Regulation 9, Regulation 9, Regulation 9, Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, Regulation 9, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, AIR2003SC2952, Regulation 9, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench of, Regulation 9

MONEY: 50 per cent, 50 per cent, 40 per cent, 50 per cent, 40 per cent, 50 per cent, 20 per cent, 45 per cent

GPE: day.5, Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, Sections, Justification, P.G., the State of Rajasthan

LOC: Single Judge, Single

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //