Assistant Commissioner Vs. N. Trivikrama Rao

Decided On : Sep-13-1993

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

LAW: Section 64(1, Section 64(1)(i, the Explanation to Section 64, Section 64(1)(ii, Section 64(1)(ii, Section 64(1)(ii, Section 64(1)(ii, Section 64(1)(ii, Section 64(1)(ii, Section 64(1)(ii, Section 64(1)(ii, Section 64(1)(i, Section 64, Section 64, Section 64, Section 64(1)((i, Section 64(1)(ii

CARDINAL: 1, 19-4-88, 88,860, 9,489, 1961.3, 147, 732, 162, 9,489.6, 147, 170, 133.7, 24, 286, 24-10-1989, 10, two, six, two, two, 13, 144, one, 2, two, 29, 521, 1965, 55, 660, 664

PERSON: Madras, Prakashchanda Basantilal[l986, Shri L. Raghavan, Madras, S. Balasubramaniam, Madras, Shri S. Sridhar, Madras, S. Balasubramaniam, Madras Bench-D, Madras, Madras, Hindu Law, Madras, Sahu Govind Prasad, Madras, S. Balasubramaniam, Le, Le, Le

DATE: year 1984-85.2, the assessment year 1984-85, year 1983-84, 1984, years 1981-82, 1982-83, the previous year, year 1984-85, the previous year, years 1981 -82 and, 1982-83, 1961, 1983, 8511, the end of the, 1956

ORG: M/s Kalyan Chakravarthy Theatre, Assessing, M/s Kalyan Chakravarthy Theatre, HUF, ITR, Court, the High Court, CIT, Madhya Pradesh High Court, Departmental Representative, CIT, Department, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Smt Rukmani Agrawalv, Tribunal, 285 &amp, S.Balasubramaniam, HUF, HUF, Assessing, Assessing, HUF, the High Court, The High Court, Department, Court, HUF, the Andhra Pradesh, Haryana High Courts, High Court, High Courts on Section 64(1, HUF, HUF, the Allahabad High Court, CIT, HUF, HUF, Firm Bagat Ram Mohanlalv, SC, HUF, the Supreme Court, CIT, Bagyalakshmi &amp, ITR, M/s Kalyan Chakravarthy Theatre, M/s Kalyan Chakravarthy Theatre, the CIT (Appeals

ORDINAL: first, first, first, third

NORP: ITAT, Punjab, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu

GPE: assessee, Gujarat

PRODUCT: the Full Bench