Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Dr. P. Sambaiah Vs. Income-tax Officer
Decided On : Aug-27-1993
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
LAW: Chapter VIA 42,200.00, Section 57(3, Section 143(3, Section 57(iii, Section 16(i, Section 2(24)(iiia, Section 2(24)(iiia, Section 57(iii, Section 57(iii, Section 57(iii, Section 57(iii
CARDINAL: 1, 30-3-1990.2, four, 13, four, 50, 50, 8,400, 8,400, 21,166.20, 1,05,831, 647.10, 10, 12, 8,400, 4, 8,400, 50, two, 4(5, 36,370, 13,195, 12,570, 625, 12,570, 647.10, 30-3-1990, 8,400, 21,166, 8,400, 21,166, 8,400, 8,400, 8,400, 50, only 50, 7, 124, 74, 147, 403, 50, 8,400, 21,166, 647.10.8, two, 8,400
DATE: the assessment year 1988-89, the accounting year, more than 5 years, year 1988-89, year 1988-89, 8,618.10, 70, 21-12 1988, the year, every month, 1980, 1969, the year
ORG: Hyderabad, State Bank of India, Agricultural Department, the State of A.P., the Department of Agriculture, Reserve Bank of India, Agricultural Development Banks, State, Bank, Tribunal, Hyderabad, National Savings Certificates of Rs, Tribunal, ITR, the Gujarat High Court, The Gujarat High Court, the House of Lords, Owen v. Pook (Inspector of Taxes, ITR, National Savings Certificates, Rqjendra Prasad Moody's, Smt, Rqjendra Prasad Moody's, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, Section, thereon constitute, Smt
PRODUCT: Scale 5 Officer
GPE: Vijayawada, Visakhapatnam, Tirupati, Counsel, India
LOC: Secretariat
MONEY: 20 per cent
PERSON: litre, Shri V. Padmanabhan, S. G. Pgnatale, Archana R. Dhanwatay's, Archana R. Dhanwatay's
ORDINAL: Firstly, second
NORP: French