Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Surayya Begum (Mst) Vs. Mohd. Usman and ors.

Decided On : Apr-26-1991

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 28, Shri Shiv, Section 19, the Hindu Succession Act, Order 1, Rule 8, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 11, the CPC;-Explanation VI-Where

PERSON: Lalit Mohan Sharma, Surayya Begum, Nos, Surayya Begum, Nos, Balmohan Gopal Kurup, Anr, Kumar Sharma, Kanji Manji v. The Trustees of, Supp, H.C. Pandey's, Mohammedan, Renu Sharma's, Surayya Begum's, Nos, Begum, Renu Sharma's, Renu Sharma's

NORP: J.1, Khalil Raza, Hindu, Joint Hindu

ORDINAL: first, first

CARDINAL: one, nine, 1, 2 to 9, 1, 2 to 9, 1, 47, 151, three, four, Two, four, two, two, 3, 461, two, two, 1, 2, 9, one, one, 2, 9

LOC: Khalil Raza, Khalil Raza, Khalil Raza, Khalil Raza, Khalil Raza, Khalil Raza

GPE: holder.3, Bombay, Surrayya Begum's, Delhi, Delhi

DATE: a decade, 1990, 1982, 1985, 1962

ORG: Supreme, the Delhi High Court, the High Court's, Textile Association, all.6, Special Leave Petition No, Reliance, Textile Association's, the Hindu Succession Act.7, Court, Textile Association (Supra, Karta, The High Court, the Additional Rent Controller, the Rent Control Tribunal

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //