Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Organo Chemical Industries and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Jul-23-1979

Court : Supreme Court of India

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Constitution, Section 14B and Rule 38, Section 15, Section 17, Section 14B, Article 14, Section 14B, Article 14, Article 14, Section 14B, Article 226, Section 14B, Section 59, the Punjab Excise Act, Section 14B, Article 37 of the Constitution, Article I have stated, Section 14B, Article 20(2, Section 14B, Article 20(2, Constitution, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 5, Article 32 of the Constitution by M/s. Organo Chemical Industries, Section 14B, Section 1(3, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 6, the Provident Funds Act, The Provident Fund Act, Section 4, Section 6 of the Act, Section 14 of the Act, Section 6, Section 14, Section 6 of the Act, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B of the Act, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 14B, Article 14, Section 14B, Section 14B of the Act, Section 15, Section 17, Section 17, Section 14B, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 10F, Bonus Schemes Act, Section 14B of the Act, Section 14B, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 6, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B of the Act, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 6, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B of the Act, Act 37 of 1953, Act 40 of 1973, 116th Report, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 14B, Section 5

PERSON: V.R. Krishna Iyer, Robert Steveris, Harman, Sen, M.P. Act, Sen, J., Chandigarh, Articles 39, Shall, S.C.R., Maneka Gandhi, Mohinder Singh Gill, Anr, N.M., Anr, Articles 14, Articles 14, Arvinder Singh's, Radhakrishan, Naturally, Anr, A.P Sen, J.26, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Counsel, Schedule, Gazette, Counsel, Counsel, J. Lalla, Anr, K. L. Gupta v., Chinta Lingam

NORP: J.1, OBJECTS

GPE: Diplock, L.J., mininero, it.7, New Delhi, Province, Bombay, LA, Kaushal, contribution.19, R.S. Joshi, Gujarat, Sonepat, Pannalal Binjrajv, authorities.42

ORG: Hughes, the Employees Provident Fund, E.P.F., the Regional Provident Fund, E.P.F., State, Damages, Jhan, the Insurance Fund, the Central Provident Fund, the Central Government, the Official Gazette, Wages, the Central Government, Bank, Court, Siemens Engineering, v. Union, Supp, Siemens, Court, Court, The Testeels Ltd., C.A. 245, Administration, Court, Court, Court, the Privy Council, AIR, Court, Court, Court, the European Court of Human Rights, Court, State, the Board of Trustees, Court, Sales Tax Officer, Ajit Mills Limited, Patna, Court, the Provident Fund, Provident Fund, State, Lazarus, Additional Solicitor General, the Regional Provident Fund, Organo Chemical Industries, Provident Fund, The Regional Provident Fund, the Haryana Electricity Board, Generating, the Haryana Financial Corporation, The Regional Provident Fund, Provident Fund, the Haryana Electricity Board, the Haryana Financial Corporation, the Regional Provident Fund, The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, the Family Pension Fund, the Central Government, the Central Government, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Parliament, the 'Employees' Provident Funds, the Family Pension Fund, Section 6A, the Central Government, G.S.R. 315, Scheme, the Employees' Provident Fund, the Family Pension Scheme, the Family Pension Fund, the Family Pension Fund.35, Provident Fund, Parliament, the Provident Fund, the Regional Provident Fund, the Provident Fund, the Regional Provident Fund, un, the Regional Provident Fund, the Regional Provident Fund, 14B. Power, the Insurance Fund, the Central Provident Fund, the Central Government, the Official Gazette, the Regional Provident Fund, the Regional Provident Fund, the Regional Provident Fund, Court, Coal Mines Provident Fund, Court, the Regional Provident Fund, the Regional Provident Fund, The Regional Provident Fund, Court, Government, v. Union of India, Bombay Municipal Corporation, Scheme, the High Courts, Scheme, Scheme, these High Courts, Additional Solicitor General, the High Courts, the High Courts, these High Courts, Legislature, Schemes, Scheme, Provident Fund, the Regional Provident Fund, Employees' Provident Fund Scheme, Scheme, the Employees Provident Fund, Provident Fund, The National Commission on Labour, Provident Fund, Parliament, the Estimates Committee, the National Commission on Labour, Government, the Estimates Committee, Act, the Family Pension Fund, the Regional Provident Fund, Additional Solicitor General, the Family Pension Fund, Scheme

CARDINAL: 49, 2., 41, 2, 5, 38, 1, 1, 499, 2, 1978]2SCR621, 3, 1978]2SCR272, one, 5/-, 1979]1SCR845, 1979]118ITR534(SC, one, two, 73, 271, 3, 558, more than one, 468, 1978]1SCR338, seven, 23, 92,687.00, 223.35, 2,452.40/-, 1976.30, one, 1, 2, 2,309.80, twenty, twenty, one thousand to two thousand, twenty-five, two, 2, 5, twenty-five, one, 1, 1968]1SCR274, one, 1971]2SCR871, 1957]1SCR233, one, two-fold, twenty-five, twenty-five, 40, 3.65, 5.96, 14.6, 20.65, 1972.2

DATE: 1952, arrear, fifteen days, every ' month's, fifteen days, the month, monthly, arrear, 1976, 1970, 17th December, 1975, 19, 21, 1947, 1973, winter, October 12, 1977, 1952, 1952, March, December 1975 to, November 1976, June 7, 1977, a few months to a year, 1,40,165.15, May 6, 1974, August 16, 1977, 1,40,165.15, May 6, 1974, the period, November 1970, January 1971, October 1971, February 1972, March, April 1973, August to October, 1973, January, February 1974, the period March 1974, May to August 1974, October, December 1974, January 1975, February 17, 1972, September 25, 1975, December 13, October 12, 1977, 1952, 1952, 1952, 1509, September 2, 1952, Para 30, 38, fifteen days, a particular month, the 15th day of the month, six months, Para 76, six months, 1,000/-.34, 1971, 1952, 1971, March 4, 1971, each month, arrear, less than one month, more than 12 months, less than one month, 1958, 1958, 1976)IILLJ91SC, 1963, Section 14B, Section 14B, the 15th of the following month, arrear, arrear, 1959-60, the 31st March 1967, 3.1st March, 1970, the 31st March, April 1970

PERCENT: 6 1/4%, 100%, 100%, 60%, 50%, 60%, 6 1/4%, 1-1/6%, 1-1/6%, 25%, 100%

ORDINAL: First, first, firstly, secondly

WORK_OF_ART: 4th Edition, Contract or Tort, Contract or Tort

EVENT: the Sunday Times Case, under-Section 14B, Under Section 14B

TIME: 2,309.80 i.e. Rs. 94,996.80 in all, 14B of the Act

MONEY: hundred per cent, hundred per cent, hundred per cent, hundred per cent, hundred per cent

PRODUCT: Act.32, Section 6A, Para 9, Para 38

QUANTITY: 8-1/3%.33

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //