Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Maulavi HusseIn Haji Abraham Umarji Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Decided On : Jul-29-2004

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Indian Penal Code, Indian Railways Act, Section 135, Section 3(1)(a, Section 23, Section 50, Section 34(1, Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 167(2, Section 167, Section 167, Section 167(2, Chapter, Section 167 of the Code, Section 167(2, Barker 25, Hampton 11 Moore, Section 167(2, Section 167(2

ORG: the Prevention of Terrorism Act, IPC, the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, the 'Public Property Act', the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Railway, POTA, POTA, the Additional Sessions, a Criminal Revision, The Special Court, POTA, POTA, POTA, POTA, the High Court, the Special Court, the High Court, POTA, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the High Court, Magistrate, POTA, and(b, Special Court, Ginning Factory, Calcutta Tramways Co. Ltd., Corporation of Calcutta, Metropolitan Life Assurance Co., AC 647(HL, Gujarat Revenue Tribunal, Kerala State Housing Board and Ors, Coke, Forbes, Ors, Court, Legislature, intent.19 Words, Legislature, See Institute of Chartered Accountants, Legislature, Parliament, Vickers Sons, Maxim Ltd., AC 445, Lenigh Valley Coal Co., Union of India, Court, Sales Tax, M.P. v. Popular Trading Company, Court, Legislature, AC 557, POTA, POTA, POTA

DATE: 2002, 27.2.2002, 1860, 1989, 1984, 1951, 11.2.2003, 1973, the period of, 30 days, less than 180 days, 15 days, the period of, 15 days', '15 days' in Section 167(2, 30 days', the period of, 30 days, the 30 days period, 167(2, fifteen days, the period of, 15 days, ninety days, sixty days, ninety days, sixty days, fifteen days', 'ninety days' and ', sixty days', thirty days', 'ninety days' and 'ninety days', ninety days, ninety days, 1880, 1991)IILLJ50SC, 146)13, 1922, 285.16, 1940, 1978, 1910, 1977]2SCR392, 1966, '25, 61

GPE: Godhra, the State of Gujarat, Gujarat, West Derby Union, Littleton, Taunton, Kerala, India, Crawford, Dilipbhai, Mercara, L.J., quae

ORDINAL: first, first, second, second, first

PRODUCT: the 'Railways Act', Chapter XXXIII

EVENT: the Bombay Police Act, the 'Code', SC 74

CARDINAL: 3(2, 6.2.2003, 13.2.2003, 6.3.2003, 24.4.2003, 2, 2, 30, less than, 9, 2, up to, one hundred and, 10, 5, 170, 1962]2SCR159, 1965]3SCR354, one, 1991]2SCR802, two, 1, 9, 836.15, 2003]3SCR826, 6, 1, 1998]2SCR56, 1, four, 218, 547, Two, four, 1, 577, 345, 1, One

PERSON: Panchmahal, Godhra, Colin Gonsalves, Magistrate, Mullins, Shah Bhojraj Kuverji, Said Lord Watson, Raje Ram Sheoram, Ramapriya Hotels, St James, Jennings v. Kelly, Ali M.K., Anr, AIR, Legislatures, Nathjibhai Patel, Anr, Frank Jones, Loreburn L.C., Evans, Jamma Masjid, Kodimaniandra Deviah, Statutes, Learned Hand, Filip Tiago De Gama, R. Venkatchalam, v. Dy, Danackwerts, Artemiou, Reid, Luke v. IRC, Fenton, quod semel, Buller, Jones, Grey v. Pearson 6, Jervis, Abley, Dale 11, jura adaptantur'

WORK_OF_ART: Subhash Chandra Yograj Sinha, Tribhovandas Haribhai Tamboli v., A.C. 206 .17

NORP: R.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //