Papnasam Labour Union Vs. Madura Coats Ltd. and anr. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Dec-08-1994

Court: Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 25-M of the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Dispute (Amendment) Act, Section 25-M of the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25-M, Section 25-M, Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25-M, Section 25-M of the Industrial Disputes Act, Chapter, Section 25C, Section 25, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25, Section 25-M, Constitution, Section 25-M and Section 25-N., Section 25, Section 25, Section 25(M, Section 25(N, Section 25, Section 25-O, Section 25, Article 19(6, Section 25-M and Section 25-N, Section 25, Section 25-M.7, Section 25-N, Section 25-N, Section 25-N, Section 25-N, Constitution, Section 25-N., Section 25, Section 25-M and Section 25-N, Section 25, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25-N, Section 25-M., Section 25-M, Section 25-M, Section 3, Section 4, Section 4, Article 19(1)(g, Article 19, Section 20, Section 20, the Keraia Act, Article 19, Article 19, Article 19, Section 2, Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25-N of the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25-M., Section 25-N, Section 25-M. Dr., Section 25-M, Section 25-M, Section 25-M, Section 25-M, Section 25-M, Section 25-N, Section 25, Section 25, Section 25-M., Section 25-M, Article 19 of the Constitution of India, Article 19 of the Constitution, Article 19, Article 19, Article 19 of the Constitution, Article 14, Article 19, the Section 25-N, Section 25-N, Section 25-N, Section 25 N, Constitution, Section 25-N, Section 25-N, Section 25-N, the Amending Act, Section 25-N, Section 25-N, the Amending Act, Section 25-N, Section 25-M., Section 25-M, Section 25-M, Section 25-M and Section 25-N, Section 25-O, Section 25-M(2, Section 25-N, Section 25-M., Section 25-K, Section 25-M, the Amending Act

PERSON: G. N. Ray, J.1, Madras, Madras, Gazette, causal workman, Kumar, Kumar, Excel Wear's, Reasons, Meenakshi Mill's, Meenakshi Mill's, Meenakshi Mill's, Meenakshi Mill's, Shankar Ghosh, Ghosh, Rao v. State, Bidi, Bidis, Rao, Bidis, Ghosh, Ghosh, Ghosh, Rajamanickan, Ghosh, Meenakshi Mill's, Ghosh, Meenakshi Mill's, ia Meenakshi MiH's, Ghosh, Ghosh, Ghosh, Ghosh, Ghosh, Ghosh, Meenakshi Mill's, Meenakshi Mill's, Meenakshi Mill's, Meenakshi Mill's, Ghosh, Meenakshi Mill's

ORG: 9th Apri, the Division Bench, the High Court, Madura Coats Ltd, the State of Tamil Nadu, Labour and Employment Department, the Division Bench, Court, Wear v. Union of India :, Court, The High Court, Court, the High Court, the Apex Court, the Industrial Dispute (Amendment) Act, the Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, for(4, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the State Government, Counsel, Court, Court, Meenakshi Mills Ltd., Meenakashi Mills Ltd, Court, Government, the Statement of Objects, AIR 1992 SCW, Counsel, AIR SCW, Court, the State Government, Court, Counsel, Madura Coats Ltd., Court, Berar Regulation of Manufacture of Bidi, Court, Court, Court, Controller, Court, Kerala AIR 978 SC 771, Bench, Court, Parliament, Legislature, Court, Management of Kairbette Estate, Court, Court, Court, AIR SCW, Court, Court, Court, Court, State, AIR SCW, AIR 1992 SCW, AIR 1992 SCW, Judicial, AIR 1992 SCW, the Statement of Object, AIR SCW

DATE: 1981, 1947, 1976, 1976, 11h, September 1976, 1119, 1977, 1976, 1776, 1976, a period of, fifteen days, 01, a period of, two months, today, the period of two months, 90 days, 1992)IILLJ294SC, 1984, 1976, 1378, 1984, 1992, 1378, 1378, 1948, the agricultural season, the agricultural season, 1953, the day, Para 6, 1378, 1378, two months, two months, 1992, 1378, 1984, 1992, 1378, Articles 38, 1378, 1378, three months, 1378, 1976, 1976, two months, two Months, two months, 1992, 1378, 1947, 1976

CARDINAL: 119, 977, 1, 1, 4, one, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, two, 1, 2, 1978)IILLJ527SC, two, 3, 4, 4, 2, 3, three, 2, two, 2, 2, 25, 1950]1SCR759, 3 and 4, 1, 2, 1950]1SCR759, 6, 1954]1SCR803, seven, seven, 6, 1960)IILLJ275SC, AIR)Any, 1960]3SCR887, 1962]2SCR125, seven, 6, 1992)IILLJ294SC, 39(a, 41, 43, 17, 2, 2, 3, 2, 2).18, 2, 3, 4, 25, 25

PRODUCT: Excel, Excel Wear's, Excel Wear's, Excel Wear's, Excel Wear's, Excel Wear's, Excel Wear's

LOC: Apex

ORDINAL: second

FAC: Excel Wears

GPE: Workmen, Bidi, Province, Pathumma v. State, Meenakashi Mills, Exhypothesi, upholdng

WORK_OF_ART: Amending Act 1984

TIME: the hours, 1952CriLJ966