Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Capt. Virendra Kumar, Advocate Vs. Shiv Raj Patil, Speaker Lok Sabha

Decided On : Jul-29-1993

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 3(2, Constitution, a Constitution Bench, Para 81, Section 6, Section 6, Article 124(5, Article 124(5, Para 91 @ pp 750)Indeed, Para 97, Constitution, Article 105:(1, Constitution, Article this Court

PERSON: S. Mohan, Justice V. Ramaswami, Justice V. Ramaswami, Lok Sabha, Justice V. Ramaswami, Dicey, Lok Sabha

NORP: J.1

ORG: this Writ Petition, Notice, Committee, the Judges (Inquiry) Act, Committee, Parliament, the Lok Sabha, Parliament, Congress, Parliament, the AIADMK party, Parliament, Congress, Parliament, House, the Judges (Inquiry) Act, Parliament, House, Parliament, Parliament, House, Parliament, Congress, AIADMK party's, House, Congress, AIADMK party, Sub-Committee, Judicial Accountability v. Union of India and Ors, the Lok Sabha, Court, Parliament, Parliament, the Judges (Inquiry) Act, House, Parliament, Act, Parliament, Parliament, T.R.S. Allan, Parliament, Parliament, the House of Commons, House of Commons, TRS Allan, Parliament, Parliament, Court, Parliament, House of Parliament, under:.The, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Court, The Writ Petition

CARDINAL: 108, 1993.3, nine, one, 13.3.91, two, 5, 4, 5, 4, 751, 614.11, 12, 1971]1SCR612

DATE: March 12, 1991, 10th May, 8th May, 1993, 1968, the present day, 1985

TIME: the last minute, the last minute

WORK_OF_ART: The Constitutional Process

ORDINAL: first, second, first, second

PRODUCT: 747-748)Similarly, Sanjiva

GPE: Judges, Tej Kiran

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //