Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Northern India theatres (P.) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Decided On : Jan-27-1993
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
LAW: Section 40(3, the Finance Act, Section 40, the Finance Act, Section 40, the Finance Act, Section 40(3)(vi, the Finance Act, Section 40 of Finance Act, Section 40, Section 40, Section 40, Section 40, Section 40, the Finance Act, Section 40, the Finance Act, Section 2(e, Section 2(e, Section 40, the Finance Act, Section 40(3, the Finance Act, Section 116, Section 106, Section 2(e, The Ahmedabad Bench, Section 40(3)(vi, the Finance Act, the Finance Act, Section 40, the Finance Act, Section 40(3, the Finance Act, Section 2(e, Section 7(2, Section 4 of the Finance Act, Section 40, the Finance Act, Section 40, Section 40, Section 40, Section 40, the Finance Act, Section 40, the Finance Act, Section 2(e, Section 40, the Finance Act, Section 40, the Finance Act, Section 2(e, Section 13 of the Finance Act, Section 2(e)(2)(iii, Section 2(e)(v, Section 2(e)(2)(iii, Section 2(e)(v, the Finance Act, Section 2(e, Section 106, Section 2(e)(2)(iii, Section 2(e)(2)(iii, Section 40(3)(vi, the Finance Act, Section 2(e)(2)(iii, Section 40(3, the Finance Act
CARDINAL: 1, 1.1 to 3, 4, 3, 1-4-1988, 184, 34.4, 27, 26, four, 14,500, 1,74,000, 3.57, 85,57,400, 28, 1-4-1988, 2, 3, 5, 26, 2.25, one, 3, 3, one, two, two, 3, 4, 5, 2, 3, 5, one, 3, 72, 72, 2.25
GPE: New Delhi, New Delhi, Jhandewalan, New Delhi, of'substituted
DATE: year 1984-85.2, 1983, 1957, 1983, 1983, 1988, 1990, 1959, the year 1948, a period of, 20 years, 20 years ending, 1983, 1989, 1983, 1988, 1983, 1983, 1983, from month to month, 1882, January 1988, the year, 1983, 1983, 1988, 1988, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1983, 1983, six years, 1960, 1958, 1963, six years, six years, 1964, 1964, six years, 1969, 1969, six years, 1969, 1958, 1963, month, six years, 1958, 1963, 1958, 1963, 1959, 1960, years, the year 1978, 1978, 1983
ORG: Naaz Cinema, the CWT (Appeals, Naaz Cinema Building, the Cinema Building, the Supreme Court, Delhi Improvement Trust, Delhi Improvement Trust, Ice Pvt. Ltd., D.L.F. Limited, D.D.A., D.L.F. Universal Ltd., DLF Universal Ltd., M/s. Naaz Cinema, Cycle, M/s.Naaz Cinema Delhi, inter alia, Plant &, Machinery, Bangalore Bench, the Appellate Tribunal, Prakash Talkies, First WTO, ITD 213, DLF Universal Ltd., D.D.A., the Hon'ble High Court, Reliance, Departmental Representative Smt, Departmental Representative, Court, Departmental Representative Smt, M/s.Naaz Cinema, the CWT (Appeals, D.D.A., S.K. Tulsi &, Sons, Tulsi Theatre, S.K. Tulsi &, Sons, Patel Enterprises, Shashi Theatre, Prakash Talkies, Tribunal, Tribunal, Parliament, not.exhausted, Tribunal, Tribunal, Sections 5, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Government of U.P., Government, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, CWT, Parliament, the Supreme Court, Muthukrishna Ammal's, SC, Parliament, the Supreme Court, the Government of U.P., the Government of Uttar Pradesh, the Government of U.P., the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Appellate Tribunal, M/s. Naaz Cinema, the D.L.F. Universal Ltd., The D.L.F. Universal Ltd., D.D.A., the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, Prakash Talkies, Park Hotel, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, the Supreme Court, the CWT (Appeals
TIME: 9-11-1992, 9-11-1992
WORK_OF_ART: Cinema House
PERSON: F.S. Gandhi v. CWT, Valuer, Cinema Building, Cinema, Anuja Sarangi, Anuja Sarangi, A.V. Mayyappa Chettiar, F.S. Gandhi, R.A. Muthukrishna, Benches, F.S. Gandhi, Cinema
PRODUCT: Memorandum, 801
FAC: Park Hotel