Tulsi Ram Agrawal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Decided On : Jan-21-1993

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Patna

LAW: the IT Act, Section 57(iii, Section 57(iii, Section 57(iii, Section 57(iii, Section 57(iii, Section 36(1)(iii, Section 57(iii, Section 57(iii, the IT Act, Section 36(1)(iii, Section 67, Section 57(iii, Section 67, Section 67, Sections 69, Sections 69 and 68 of the Act, Sections 69

CARDINAL: 1, two, 30-6-1992, 22,742, 69A(sic, 22,742, 5, 8,676, 1, 5, 2,89,314, 1,20,000, 3, 4, 115, 84, 84, 131, only two, 19,642, 1,65,500, 1,20,000, two, 1959, 36, 1968, 70, 267, 273, 57(iii, 32, 19,642, 15,430, 69A., 15,430, 15,430

ORG: CIT (Appeals, Sections 69 &amp, M/s Bharat Engineering &, M/s B.F. Industries, Bharat Engineering, Body Building Private Ltd., M/s BEBCO, V.K. Saraf, Navin Kumar Agarwal, CIT, Rqjendra Prasad Moody, SC, the High Courts, Seth Shiv Prasad v., CIT, CIT, Smt, CIT, CIT, CIT (Appeals, M/s B.K. Saraf, Navin, Bharat Foam Industries, V.K. Saraf, Navin Kumar, CIT (Appeals, Shri V. Dayal, M/s BEBCO.Out, M/s BEBCO, Assessing, Assessing, the Supreme Court, Rqjendra Prasad Moody's, CIT, CIT, CIT (Appeals, the CIT (Appeals, Assessing, CIT (Appeals, Assessing, CIT (Appeals, Assessing, B.K. Saraf, Shri V. Dayal, Navin, CIT, Sections 69 &amp, CIT (Appeals, Sections 69 &amp, the CIT (Appeals, CIT

DATE: 1961, the year, 31-8-1989, 1978, 1972, 1972, 1981, 1987, 15,430.7

GPE: omitted).2, Khuntelal, Khuntelal, India, Khuntelal

PERSON: Body Building, Khuntelal Rs, Memraj Manmal Ruia, Viramati Ramkrishna, Justice Desai, Lordships, Desai, V. Dayal, Kumar Agrawal, Krishna Kumar Agrawal, Kumar Agrawal, Kasturbhai Lalbhai, Kumar Agrawal, Kumar Agrawal

NORP: Nitish

PRODUCT: 329