Pratibha Nema and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Decided On : Jul-30-2003

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 4(1, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 17(1, Section 4(1, Section 5A, Section 6, Section 9(2, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 6, Section 5A, Section 6, Section 5A, Section 4, Section 4(1, Section 3, Central Act 68 of 1984, a Constitution Bench, Section 6, Section 5A(2, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6(1, the Constitution Bench, Section 6(1, Section 6, Section 6(1, Section 6(1, Section 6, Section 6(1, Section 6(1, Section 3(e, Section 3 of the Companies Act, the Societies Registration Act, Section 38-A, Section 41, Section 40, Section 41, Section 6(1, the Constitution Bench, Section 40, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6(1, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6(1, Section 6(1, Section 6(1, Section 6(1, the Zonal Pollution Officer, the Companies Act, Section 17(1, Section 17(1, Section 6, the Land Acquisition Act, Land Acquisition Act, Section 5-A, Section 4(1, Section 4, Section 6(1, Section 4(2, Section 4, the Constitution Bench, Section 5A, Section 4, Section 5A., Section 5A, Section 4, Section 5A, Section 4, Section 5A.' 37, Section 4(1, Section 4(1, Article 226, Article 226, the Lay Out Plan

NORP: J.1, Punjab, Maharashtra, Cheque, Cheque, Cheque, Cheque

CARDINAL: 73.3, 44.8, 24.1.1996, 29.1.1996, 9.2.1996, 2,14,91,115, 15.10.1996, 3.1.1997, 684, 2/2001, 29.8.2001, four, four, 3, 2/2001, 5, four, four, 1, 2., 3., 4, 2, One, 1963]2SCR774, 100, 1971]3SCR871, three, three, 3, 3, 1980]1SCR1071, 3).16, 100, 1967]1SCR373, 1964]6SCR784, less than 100, 1, 2, 3, two, 12, one, two, 1961]2SCR459, 22, 7.6.1996, 1.5, 6, 26.2.1996, 1.5, 7.19, 24, two, 3, 25, 7.6.1996, 2, 26, 27, two, 22.1.1996, 73.304, 44.816, 22.1.1996, 24.1.1996, 29.1.1996, 9.2.1996, 31, 73, 12, 12, 57, two, two, 32, 33, 6, 1992]1SCR657, 1973]1SCR973, 36, 1975]1SCR802, One, 136, two, 39, 25, 10, One, one, 41

GPE: Rangwasa, Tehsil, India, I.A., I.A., acquisition.3, Hamabai, India, Somawanti v. State, Jage Ram v. State, Gujarat, China, Bajirao T. Kote, Pandit, Antwerp, Belgium, Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, Nigam, india, Rangwasa, Antwerp, Indore, Governmental, Singh v. Union of India, Delhi, Delhi, Paragraph 10

LOC: Indore District, Somavanti, Somawanti, Somawanti

ORG: Department and/or, Kendra Vikas Nigam Ltd., District Industries, the Government of Madhya Pradesh (Commerce & Industries Department, The District Collector, Indore, Indore Division, the Collector & Ex-officio, SDO, District Industries, The Collector (Land Acquisition, the Letters Patent Appeals, Court, the State of Madhya Pradesh, the High Court, Court, the High Court, B. Arun Kumar International Ltd., Company, Arun Kumar International Ltd., the State Government, Respondent-Company, the High Court, The High Court, Court, Sections 4 & 6, Companies, Batchelor, Bombay High Court, State, the Privy Council, Batchelor, The Privy Council, the Privy Council, Batchelor, Government, Acquisitions of Land for Companies', Corporation, State, Corporation, State, Government, State, State, State, Somavanti, State, State, State, Court, State, Court, Indrajit C. Parekh v. State, Sub-Section, Government, Court, Court, Government, Government, State of Punjab, Court, Court, Court, Batchelor, Court, Sections 4 & 6, The State Government, Somavanti, Government, Court, Court, the State Government, State, Court, Court, U.P., Somavanti, State, Court, Court, Companies, Government Company, Society, Society, Society, State, Society, Company, Court, Srinivasa Co-, House Building Society Limited, Wanchoo, Sections 4 & 6, Government, Government, Court, The High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Government, Nigam, State, District Industries, State, Corporation, Nigam, the State Government, Nigam, Nigam, State, Nigam, the Land Acquisition Collector, M/s. Arum Kumar International Limited, AKI Ltd., Nigam, Company, Company, MOU, The High Court, Nigam, the State Government, AKI Ltd., MOU, Nigam, B. Arun Kumar Group of Companies, Nigam, the High Court, Nigam, MOU, MOU, Company, MOU, Company, the High Court, the Cheque for Rs, AKI Ltd., the High Court, Company, Nigam, Nigam, MOU, Nigam, Company, Nigam, Nigam, MOU, State, Corporation, the State Government, AKI Ltd., the Industries Department, Indore Division, Indore, Company, Company, State Government, B. Arun Kumar Group, MOU, Nigam, District Industries, Page No. 114, 9th/10th Respondent, Advocate-General, the State of Madhya Pradesh, Corporation (Nigam, the High Court, the State Government, the State Government, Government, State, Court, State, The State Government, the `Industrial Policy and Action Plan, State, Nigam, State, Industrialists, Industrial Policy, District Industries, the District Collector, Indore, The District Collector, The State Government, Nigam, the Land Acquisition Collector, Advocate-General, MOU, Nigam, Commerce, Department, Nigam, Companies, AKI Ltd., MOU, MOU, AKI Ltd., Advocate-General, Industries Department, AKI Ltd., AKI Ltd., MOU, Government, Advocate-General, State, Government, Company, AKI Ltd., Government, Sections 4(1, Court, Madhya Pradesh Housing Board, Housing Board', Court, inter alia, Court, State, Court, Munshi, M.P. Housing Board's, the State Government, jargon, Industrial Park, Information Technology Park, District Industries, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Land Acquisition Officer, the Constitutional Courts, Reliance, Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests, MHOW, Defence, Advanced Technology, Department of Atomic Energy, the Advanced Technology, Nigam, the Ministry of Defence, the Rajya Sabha, Court, Advocate-General, State Government, the State Government

ORDINAL: 9th, 9th, second, first, secondly, second, third, second, 2nd, First, second, first, sixth, second, sixth, First

PERSON: Collector, Nos, Haryana, D.A. Desai, Somvanti, Bench, Malimabu, Bench, Krishna Iyer, Fraud, Ram, K.S. Hedge, Haryana, Jageram, R.L. Arora v. State, G. Sastry, R.L. Arora v. State, Jhandu Lal v. State, Rosy Blue, Rosy Blue, Aflatoon, Mathew

DATE: 30th June, 1996, A few days later, 15 days, 11.10.1996, '10, '11, '12, '13, '15, '18, 1994, 20.2.1996, 13.9.19975, next day, 1st November, 1995, a week, 22.9.1995, 1.11.1995, 1999, 1994, 23.11.1995, 14.9.1995, 35, 38, the year 1992, 11.9.1996, 40

PERCENT: 80%

WORK_OF_ART: Notification under Section 6, 'Industrial Policy and Action Plan, the Memorandum of Understanding, the Memorandum Of Understanding, a Memorandum of Understanding

QUANTITY: about 63 acres, 150-200 acres, 200- 260 acres, 150 to 200 acres, 150 acres, 3 kilo meters

PRODUCT: Re 1, Re 1, Para 2.22, Companies