Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Basant Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Decided On : Aug-31-2001

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Rule 21 and Rule 65-A of the Rajasthan Minor Minerals Concession Rules, Rule 5, Section 15, Rule 65-A, Rule 65-A of the Rules, Section 15 of the Act, Section 15(3

PERSON: S. Rajendra Babu, J.1, Rajasthan, Nos, Morwad, Nos, Murari Goayl v. State, Shri Sushil, Kumar Jain, Addl, Rule 65A

ORG: the High Court, the State Government, The High Court, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No, the Mining Engineer,, Department of Mines & Geology, Mines & Geology, the State Government, the Mines & Minerals (Regulation & Development, Government, the High Court, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Court, O.K. Trivedi & Sons and Ors, The High Court, The High Court, Government, the Rajasthan High Court, the High Court, Trivedi, the High Court, Court, the State Government

DATE: 1986, October 10, 1994, 1995, 10 years, 1957, 4 years, 4 years, 4 years, four years, every five years, 1992, 1994

CARDINAL: 2,3, 5, 865, 2, 2.12.1993, 2,3, 5, 3., 21, 4., 2, 1, 5., two, 6

NORP: Rules, Rules

GPE: Strong, Gujarat, D.K., Rajasthan

FAC: Second Schedule

WORK_OF_ART: the Marble Policy

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //