Dev Raj Dogra and Others Vs. Gyan Chand JaIn and Others

Decided On : Mar-10-1981

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 151, Section 52, Section 52, Section 65A, Section 65A, Section 52, Section 65-A of the Transfer of Property Act, Section 52, Section 52, Section 52, Section 52, Section 65-A of the Transfer of Property Act, Section 52, Section 65-A, Section 52, Section 52, Section 58, Section 52, Section 65-A of the Transfer of Property Act, Section 52 of the Act, Section 52, Section 58(a, Section 30, Rule 94, Rule 94, Section 52, Section 58, the Amending Act, Rule 96, Rule 94, Section 64, Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, Section 42, Section 52, Section 52, Section 52, Section 65A(2)(a, Section 52, Section 65A(2)(e, Section 65A(2)(e, Section 64, Order XXI Rule 63, Section 65A, Order XXI Rule 58, Section 65A, Section 65-A., Order 34, Rule 1, Section 52, Section 52 and Section 65-A of the Transfer of Property Act, Section 65-A, Section 52, Section 65-A, the Amending Act 1929, Section 52 of the Act, Section 52, Section 65-A of the Transfer of Property Act, Section 52 of the Act, Section 52, Section 52, Section 52, Section 52, Rule 95, Rule 96, Rule 96

CARDINAL: 1, 1, two and half, 5, 95, 96, 2, 5, 28.6.1960, 6.11.1962, 3.9.1963, 479177.49, 9, 479177.49, 3.9.1963, 28.10.1971, 6.8.1973, 25.10.76, 95, 9, three, 1976]1SCR237, 1973]1SCR139, 2, two, two, two, 95, 96, 1967]3SCR125, 2, 1, 2, 95, 96, 2, 3, 95, 96, 95, 2, 3, 96, One, 1973]1SCR139, 1956.12, 96, 58, One, 63, two, 132, 95, 96, 95, 96, two, 153, 96, two, 95

ORG: Special Leave, Court, Des Raj Agarwal, Raj Kumar & Co., WEA, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Bank, Bank, CPC, the Hon'ble Court, the Delhi High Court, Bank, the Bombay High Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Delhi High Court, the Bombay High Court, the Gujarat High Court, Court, Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd., Court, Section are-(1, Legislature, the Bombay High Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, the Gujarat High Court, Court, Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd., Jayaram Mudaliar, Ors, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, CPC, Court, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Mfs, Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd., Court, Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd., the Division Bench, Court, the State of Jammu, the Central Government, Court, Court, Order XXI, CPC, Court, Court, Court, Court, Order XXI, CPC, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Mjs., General Films Exchange Ltd., Court, Jayaram Mudaliar, Ors, Mis., General Films Exchange Ltd., Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd., The Central Bank of India, the Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd., Company, Sections 52, CPC, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Jayaram Mudaliar, the Transfer of Property Act, Court, the Trial Court, the High Court, Order XXI, CPC, CPC, The Trial Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, CPC, CPC, Court, Court, Court, Court, follows;-A, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Jayaram Mudaliar, Government, Court, Court, Court, Court, CPC

PERSON: Gyan Chand Jain, Karol Bagh, Gyan Chand Jain, Karol Bagh, Dev Raj Dogra, Kumar Khosla, Balwant Singh, Gyan Chand Jain, Gyan Chand Jain, Order XXI, Gyan Chand Jain, Ramdas Popat Patil v. Fakira Pandu Patil, Jagjiwandas, Anaji Thamaji Patil v. Ragho Bhivraj Patil, Anr, Brijnath Singhji Deo, Jayaram Mudalhir, Ayya Swami, Bhatia, Bhatia, Bhatia, Bhatia, Bhatia, Ramdas Popat Patil v. Fakira Pandu Patil, Jagjiwandas, Ramdas Popat Pati's, Anaji Thamaji Patil v. Ragho Bhivraj Patil, Bhatia, Brijnath Singhji Deo, Ayya Swami, Bhatia, Order XXI, Bhatia, Kakkar, Kakkar, Kakkar, Kakkar, Kakkar, Mangru Mahto, Brijnath Singhji Deo, Kakkar, Jayaram Muda-liar, Brijnath Singh, Ayya Swami, Bishan Singh, Khazan Singh, Mangru Mahto, Order XXI, Order XXI, Order XXI, Order XXI, Mangni Mahto, Rules 95, Order XXI, Order XXI, Gian Chand Jain, Gian Chand Jain

GPE: New Delhi, New Delhi, India, Us, Ayyaswami, Us, C.P.C.

PERCENT: 6%

FAC: Clauses 8

DATE: March, 1961, two years, two years, 1966, 1967, 1970, 96, 1929, later than six months, three years, 1929, Rule 94, 7th May, 1960, 1940, 1946, 1946, 1954, 1956, 1956, 1948, 1956, 1956, 1951, a mortgagor to three years, 1956, 1956, Rule 95

LOC: Single Judge, Single, Single, Kashmir, satisfied.7

PRODUCT: the Full Bench, Rule 95

ORDINAL: third, third

QUANTITY: 243-244

EVENT: Assam 101, the Civil Procedure Code