Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Karnataka Electricity Board, Bangalore and ors.

Decided On : Feb-23-1993

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Rule 1 Order XL, Section 49, Section 49, Section 49, Section 49, Section 49, Section 49, Section 49, the Tripartite Agreement, Section 49

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 5, two, two, two, 1980.3, two, two, 50 and 51, 5, 6

ORG: the Supreme Court Rules, the Writ Petitioner Company, the State Government, the Electricity Board, the Government of India, the Writ Petitioner Company, Indian Aluminium Company Ltd., the Writ Petitioners, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, the State Electricity Board, the Karnataka State Electricity Board, Officers, the High Court, Writ Petition, the Karnataka State Electricity Board, Court, Court, Court, the Electricity Board, High Power Intensive Industry, the Karnataka State Electricity Board, the Central Government, State Governments and Electricity Boards, the State Electricity Board, the State Government of Karnataka, Court, the State Electricity Board, the Karnataka Government, the Karnataka Electricity Board, the State Government of Karnataka, the Karnataka State Electricity Board, the State Government of, Karnataka State Electricity Board, Court, The Review Petition

DATE: May 13, 1992, 1988, August 1 7, 1976, the expiry of six months, July 3, 1980, 1948, November 21, 1980, the period, 1980, November 21, 1980, July 1, 1980, November 21, 1980, July 1, 1980, November 21, the period, 1980, November 21, 1980, May 13, 1992, 1988, 1978, the years 1981, 1983, 1985, 1987, the years 1981, 1983, 1985, 1987, 1978

LOC: the Writ Petitioners

EVENT: Clause 6(b)(ii, Clause 6(b)(ii, Clause 6(b)(ii

WORK_OF_ART: The Ordinance of 1980

PERSON: Parasaran, Narasimha Moorthy, Narasimha Moorthy, Smelter, Parasaran, Narasimha Moorthy, Narasimha Moorthy, Parasaran, Narasimha Moorthy

GPE: Counsel, Karnataka, Counsel, Karnataka, Counsel

PRODUCT: Boards