Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise Vs. Hongo India (P) Ltd. and anr.

Decided On : Mar-27-2009

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 35H(1, Section 5 of the Limitation Act, Section 35H, Act 49/2005, Section 35H(1, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 35H(1, Chapter VI-A of the Act, Section 35, Section 35C, Central Excise Act, Section 5 of the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 35H, Article 214 of the Constitution of India, Article 215, Section 215, Section 35C, Section 35, Section 35, Section 5 and Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 25, the Indian Contract Act, Section 3, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 5, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 34, Section 30, Section 16, the Arbitration Act, 'Arbitration Act, Section 34, Section 34 of the 1996 Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 5, Section 54, Section 54, Section 54, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 110 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 45, Section 54, Section 54, Section 54, Section 54, Section 26, Section 54, Section 54, Section 54, Section 54, Central Excise Act, Article 215 of the Constitution, Chapter VIA of the Act, Section 35, Section 35H(1, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 29, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Central Excise Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 35H(1, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 5, Section 35H(1

PERSON: P. Sathasivam, S.L.P., Bench, Noida, Bench, limitation.10, Parag P. Tripathi, Order XXI, Schedule, Schedule, Counsel, Sharda Devi v. State of Bihar, Bench, M.V. Elisabeth, Hanoekar House, Swatontapeth, M.M. Thomas v. State, Anr, Noida, Bench

NORP: J.1

ORG: the High Court, Customs, Punjab Fibres Ltd., the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Customs & Central Excise, the High Court of Allahabad, The High Court, Appeals, Central Excise (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Central Government, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, the High Court, The High Court of Allahabad, the Commissioner of Central Excise, the High Court, Additional Solicitor General, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Excise Department, the High Court, State, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal and Sub-section, the Appellate Tribunal, the Central Government, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Reliance, Sections 4 to 24, Learned Additional Solicitor General, Union of India v. Popular Construction Co., the High Court, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Court, Parliament, Court, Court, the Union of India, the High Court, Court, Letters Patent, the High Court, a High Court, the High Court, the Letters Patent.10, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Letters Patent, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Letters Patent Appeal, the High Court, Letters Patent Appeal, Court, the Letters Patent ', a High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Letters Patent Appeal, Letters Patent, the High Court, the High Court, Letters Patent, the High Court, Letters Patent, the High Court, the Letters Patent, the High Court, Letters Patent, Ors, Harwan Investment, The High Courts, Court, the High Courts, The High Courts, the High Court, the Kerala Private Forests, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Parliament, Appellate Tribunal, Central Government, the High Court, the High Court, Parliament, the High Court, Punjab Fibres Ltd., Noida, Customs, Central Excise, the High Court, Singh Enterprises v. Commissioner of, Central Excise, the High Court, Sections 35, the High Court, The High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the Central Government, the High Court, the High Court, Sections 4 to 24 of, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court

DATE: 1944, 1963, 4.12.2008, 1963, sixty days, sixty days, three months, three months, ninety days, 180 days, 180 days, 180 days, 180 days, 180 days, the 1st day of July, 2003, a fee of, 180 days, 60 days, 30 days, 90 days, the number of days, 90 days, 90 days, 180 days, 1908, 1872, 1996, 1963, 1996, 1940, 1996, 1940, 1894, 1908, 1908, 1971, 30 days, 90 days, only 180 days, '19, 180 days, 30 days, 60 days, 180 days, 60 days, 90 days, 180 days, 180 days, 1944, 1944, 180 days

CARDINAL: two, three, 1, thirty, 5, 2, 1, 2, 180, 1, 1, three, 28.12.2005, 35, 35EE, 1, 1, one hundred and eighty days, two hundred, 5, 180, 1, 9, 29.3.1999, 19.4.1999, 26.10.1999, 12, 3, only one, three, 35, 35EE, 35, 35H, 180, 2000]1SCR33, 14, 17, two, 2008(221)ELT163(SC, 35EE, 35, 35H

PRODUCT: Bench, Bench, 35B, 35B, 35B

FAC: the Bombay High Court

TIME: under this Act

GPE: India, India, Kerala, the State of Kerala