Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs. S.K. Aggarwal and ors.

Decided On : Jul-31-1998

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 40, Section 40, Section 405 Explanation 2, the Indian Penal Code, Section 406, the Indian Penal Code, Section 401/482, the Criminal Procedure Code, Explanation 2 to Section 405, Section 406, the Indian Penal Code, Section 406, Section 405 Explanation 2, Section 11, the Indian Penal Code, Explanation 2 to Section 405, the Indian Penal Code, Explanation 2 to Section 405, the Indian Penal Code, Section 405, the Indian Penal Code, Section 40, Section 40, the Factories Act, Section 2(n, the Factories Act, the Factories Act, Section 40.5, Section 40, Section 40, Section 2(17, Section 2(15, Section 40, Section 100 of the Factories Act, the Factories Act, the Factories Act, Section 405, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, Explanation 2 to Section 405

PERSON: Sujata V. Manohar, J.1, Occupier, Tulsidas Kilachand, Kailashchandra, Chandigarh

ORG: M/s. Indo Japan Steel Ltd., Calcutta, the Employees State Insurance Act, Magistrate, Magistrate, The High Court, the Employees State Insurance Act, The High Court, State Insurance Fund, High Courts, the Bombay High Court, Court, Court, Legislature, The Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Bombay High Court, the Division Bench, the Bombay High Court, Suresh Tulsidas Kilachand and Ors, the High Court, the Calcutta High Court

DATE: 1948, February 1981, September 1981, 1948, 1948, 1948, 1948, 1948, 1948, 1980)IILLJ81Bom, 1948, 1989, 1992, 52, 1948, 1948, 1980)IILLJ81Bom, 1948, office.11

CARDINAL: 2, 4, 2,223.50, 1:, 2, 2, follows:-'40, 63, 2(17, 2, 22, 760, 24, 1

ORDINAL: first

NORP: period.(3)

PRODUCT: Suresh

GPE: Bombay, Bombay