Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Pawan @ Tamatar Vs. Ram Prakash Pandey and anr.
Decided On : May-10-2002
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 34, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 437, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 437 Criminal Procedure Code
PERSON: S.N. Variava, Shrimati Hem Lata Pandey, Hem Lata Pandey, Vinod Kumar, Vinod Kumar, Hem Lal Pandey, Vinod Kumar, Hem Lata, Vinod Kumar, Hem Lata Pandey, Hem Lata Pandey, Vinod Kumar, Vinod Kumar, A.S. Pundir, Pundir, Hem Lata Pandey, Copy
NORP: J.1, Indian
CARDINAL: 2, 880, 880, 2001.2, one, 2, one, two, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, two, 504, 506, 352, 228/98, 147, 148, 452, 382, 504, 506, 2, 10, two, 2, 2, 2, 2
DATE: 2001, 31st August, 2001, 31st January, 2000, 13th July, 2000, 29th September, 2000, 29th September, 2000, 31st August, 2001, 31st August, 2001, 31st August, 2001, 31st August, 2001, 1970 of 2001, 1970 of 2001, 104/97, 11.10.1998, annexure-10, an year or so, 29th September, 2000
WORK_OF_ART: Shri Vinod
ORG: Vinod Kumar, the Appellate Court, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Home, the Session Court, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, The High Court, SLP, Court, Court, inter alia, so.5, this Review Petition, State, Vinod Kumar, Special Leave Petition (Criminal, Special Leave Petition (Criminal, the High Court, Sections 143, The High Court, the Review Petition
PRODUCT: 323, grounds:'It
MONEY: 427 I.P.C., 427 I.P.C.
GPE: Kaushamibi